Literature DB >> 22071684

Static prehension of a horizontally oriented object in three dimensions.

Yen-Hsun Wu1, Vladimir M Zatsiorsky, Mark L Latash.   

Abstract

We studied static prehension of a horizontally oriented object. Specific hypotheses were explored addressing such issues as the sharing patterns of the total moment of force across the digits, presence of mechanically unnecessary digit forces, and trade-off between multi-digit synergies at the two levels of the assumed control hierarchy. Within the assumed hierarchy, at the upper level, the task is shared between the thumb and virtual finger (an imagined finger producing a wrench equal to the sum of the wrenches of individual fingers). At the lower level, action of the virtual finger is shared among the four actual fingers. The subjects held statically a horizontally oriented handle instrumented with six-component force/torque sensors with different loads and torques acting about the long axis of the handle. The thumb acted from above while the four fingers supported the weight of the object. When the external torque was zero, the thumb produced mechanically unnecessary force of about 2.8 N, which did not depend on the external load magnitude. When the external torque was not zero, tangential forces produced over 80% of the total moment of force. The normal forces by the middle and ring fingers produced consistent moments against the external torque, while the normal forces of the index and little fingers did not. Force and moment variables at both hierarchical levels were stabilized by covaried across trials adjustments of forces/moments produced by individual digits with the exception of the normal force analyzed at the lower level of the hierarchy. There was a trade-off between synergy indices computed at the two levels of the hierarchy for the three components of the total force vector, but not for the moment of force components. Overall, the results have shown that task mechanics are only one factor that defines forces produced by individual digits. Other factors, such as loading sensory receptors may lead to mechanically unnecessary forces. There seems to be no single rule (for example, ensuring similar safety margin values) that would describe sharing of the normal and tangential forces and be valid across tasks. Fingers that are traditionally viewed as less accurate (e.g., the ring finger) may perform more consistently in certain tasks. The observations of the trade-off between the synergy indices computed at two levels for the force variables but not for the moment of force variables suggest that the degree of redundancy (the number of excessive elemental variables) at the higher level is an important factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22071684      PMCID: PMC3259284          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2923-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production.

Authors:  V M Zatsiorsky; Z M Li; M L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Two virtual fingers in the control of the tripod grasp.

Authors:  G Baud-Bovy; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Prehension synergies: effects of object geometry and prescribed torques.

Authors:  V M Zatsiorsky; F Gao; M L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Distributing vertical forces between the digits during gripping and lifting: the effects of rotating the hand versus rotating the object.

Authors:  Barbara M Quaney; Kelly J Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Finger force vectors in multi-finger prehension.

Authors:  Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Fan Gao; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance.

Authors:  Marc H Schieber; Marco Santello
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-06

7.  Tangential load sharing among fingers during prehension.

Authors:  Todd Pataky; Mark Latash; Vladimir Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Prehension synergies during nonvertical grasping, I: experimental observations.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Finger control in the tripod grasp.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci; Luana Caselli; Claudio Secchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Control of finger force vectors with changes in fingertip referent coordinates.

Authors:  Yen-Hsun Wu; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Multi-digit coordination during lifting a horizontally oriented object: synergies control with referent configurations.

Authors:  Yen-Hsun Wu; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interpersonal synergies: static prehension tasks performed by two actors.

Authors:  Stanislaw Solnik; Sasha Reschechtko; Yen-Hsun Wu; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Role of Tactile Noise in the Control of Digit Normal Force.

Authors:  Abdeldjallil Naceri; Yasemin B Gultekin; Alessandro Moscatelli; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-12

5.  Distinct behavior of the little finger during the vertical translation of an unsteady thumb platform while grasping.

Authors:  Rajakumar Banuvathy; Skm Varadhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.