Literature DB >> 6499307

The variation of the Q angle with different positions of the foot.

C Olerud, P Berg.   

Abstract

The Q angle (i.e., the angle between the rectus femoris and the patellar ligament) was measured on 34 healthy volunteers by use of three different methods: (1) a photographic method, (2) a direct method with a goniometer on erect persons, and (3) a direct method on subjects in the supine positions. The Q angle was measured with the foot in different positions with regard to inward and outward rotation and pronation and supination. It was found that the Q angle increased as the foot shifted from outward to inward rotation. The Q angle decreased as the foot shifted from pronation to supination. The reproducibility of the photographic method was good and gave basically the same values as the direct method on erect persons. However, these methods gave values different from those of the direct method on the supine person. Consequently, it is necessary to standardize the position of the foot when measuring the Q angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6499307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  A modified low-dye taping technique to support the medial longitudinal arch and reduce excessive pronation.

Authors:  S S Schulthies; D O Draper
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  No association between q-angle and foot posture with running-related injuries: a 10 week prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Daniel Ramskov; M L Jensen; K Obling; R O Nielsen; E T Parner; S Rasmussen
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

3.  Effect of Q-angle on patellar positioning and thickness of knee articular cartilages.

Authors:  Aikaterini E Tsakoniti; Dimitris G Mandalidis; Spyros I Athanasopoulos; Christoforos A Stoupis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  Clinical Significance of the Static and Dynamic Q-angle.

Authors:  Apostolos Z Skouras; Asimakis K Kanellopoulos; Sophia Stasi; Athanasios Triantafyllou; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Georgios Papagiannis; George Papathanasiou
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-11

5.  OPTOTRAK Measurement of the Quadriceps Angle Using Standardized Foot Positions.

Authors:  Lori A Livingston; Sandi J Spaulding
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  [Clinical examination for patellofemoral problems].

Authors:  G I Pagenstert; M Bachmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Evaluation of Q angle in differents static postures.

Authors:  Hugo Machado Sanchez; Eliane Gouveia de Morais Sanchez; Mario Antonio Baraúna; Roberto Sérgio de Tavares Canto
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 8.  Radiological evaluation of patellofemoral instability and possible causes of assessment errors.

Authors:  Tugrul Ormeci; Ismail Turkten; Bayram Ufuk Sakul
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2022-03-20

9.  Relationship Between Q-Angle and Articular Cartilage in Female Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: Ultrasonographic and Radiologic Evaluation.

Authors:  Ayşe Aydemir Ekim; Hatice Hamarat; Ahmet Musmul
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 1.472

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.