Literature DB >> 29901018

Relationship Between Q-Angle and Articular Cartilage in Female Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: Ultrasonographic and Radiologic Evaluation.

Ayşe Aydemir Ekim1, Hatice Hamarat2, Ahmet Musmul3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the association between Q-angle and clinical, radiological, and ultrasonographic findings in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight female patients (mean age 59.8±6.8 years; range 39 to 78 years) diagnosed with knee OA were included in this study and classified into two groups according to Q-angle of symptomatic knees: low Q-angle group (LQ) (n=40) and high Q-angle group (HQ) (n=28) (LQ-angle <15° and HQ-angle ≥15°, respectively). Patients were clinically assessed for pain and functional status by using a visual analog scale and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. X-rays of knees were scored using the Kellgren-Lawrence OA grading system. Symptomatic knees were also evaluated using ultrasonography for distal femoral cartilage thickness/grading.
RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in clinical and imaging findings between the groups (p>0.05). HQ-angle measurements were positively correlated with cartilage grading by ultrasonography (r=0.435, p=0.033) and Kellgren-Lawrence grading system (r=0.435, p=0.021), and negatively correlated with cartilage thickness measurements of the medial femoral condyle (r=-0.399, p=0.036).
CONCLUSION: We found that HQ-angle was associated with cartilage thickness measurements of the medial femoral condyle and cartilage grading by ultrasonography and the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system in patients with knee OA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Articular; cartilage; osteoarthritis of knee; ultrasound imaging

Year:  2017        PMID: 29901018      PMCID: PMC5868394          DOI: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.6145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Rheumatol        ISSN: 2148-5046            Impact factor:   1.472


  32 in total

1.  Q-angle influences on the variability of lower extremity coordination during running.

Authors:  B C Heiderscheit; J Hamill; R E Van Emmerik
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  David J Hunter; David T Felson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-18

Review 4.  The utility of musculoskeletal ultrasound in rehabilitation settings.

Authors:  Levent Ozçakar; Alparslan Bayram Carli; Fatih Tok; Levent Tekin; Nuray Akkaya; Murat Kara
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  The validity of in vivo ultrasonographic grading of osteoarthritic femoral condylar cartilage: a comparison with in vitro ultrasonographic and histologic gradings.

Authors:  C-L Lee; M-H Huang; C-Y Chai; C-H Chen; J-Y Su; Y-C Tien
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  The biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  R P Grelsamer; J R Klein
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Correlation between the Q angle and the patella position: a clinical and axial computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  R M Biedert; K Warnke
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Cartilage thickness of the knee joint in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: comparative assessment by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Dan Østergaard Pradsgaard; Bente Fiirgaard; Anne Helen Spannow; Carsten Heuck; Troels Herlin
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Factors affecting articular cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis and aging.

Authors:  R L Karvonen; W G Negendank; R A Teitge; A H Reed; P R Miller; F Fernandez-Madrid
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  The variation of the Q angle with different positions of the foot.

Authors:  C Olerud; P Berg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cartilage thickness and bone shape variations as a function of sex, height, body mass, and age in young adult knees.

Authors:  Marco Tien-Yueh Schneider; Nynke Rooks; Thor Besier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.