OBJECTIVE: While there is evidence to suggest that the magnitude of the quadriceps (Q) angle changes with alterations in foot position, a detailed quantitative description of this relationship has not been reported. Our purpose was to determine the effect of varying foot placement on the magnitude of the Q angle. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed between-within, repeated-measures design was used to compare Q angles derived under static weight-bearing conditions with the feet positioned in self-selected versus standardized stance positions. SUBJECTS: Twenty healthy young-adult men and women with no history of acute injury to or chronic dysfunction of the lower limbs. MEASUREMENTS: We placed light-emitting diodes bilaterally on the left and right anterior superior iliac spines, the tibial tuberosities, and the midpoints of the patellae to bilaterally define the Q angles. An OPTOTRAK motion-measurement system was used to capture x,y coordinate data at a sampling rate of 60 Hz. These data were subsequently filtered and used to calculate the magnitude of the left and right Q angles. RESULTS: A repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that when measured statically, Q angles differed significantly between stance positions (P <.001) and limbs (P <.05). Depending on the stance adopted, mean Q angles varied from 7.2 degrees to 12.7 degrees and 11.0 degrees to 16.1 degrees in the left and right lower limbs, respectively. Q-angle measurements taken in conjunction with the Romberg foot position most closely resembled those gathered with the feet in a self-selected stance (Pearson r = 0.86 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Q-angle magnitude varies with changes in foot position, increasing or decreasing as the foot rotates internally or externally, respectively. These data demonstrate the need for a standardized foot position for Q-angle measurements.
OBJECTIVE: While there is evidence to suggest that the magnitude of the quadriceps (Q) angle changes with alterations in foot position, a detailed quantitative description of this relationship has not been reported. Our purpose was to determine the effect of varying foot placement on the magnitude of the Q angle. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed between-within, repeated-measures design was used to compare Q angles derived under static weight-bearing conditions with the feet positioned in self-selected versus standardized stance positions. SUBJECTS: Twenty healthy young-adult men and women with no history of acute injury to or chronic dysfunction of the lower limbs. MEASUREMENTS: We placed light-emitting diodes bilaterally on the left and right anterior superior iliac spines, the tibial tuberosities, and the midpoints of the patellae to bilaterally define the Q angles. An OPTOTRAK motion-measurement system was used to capture x,y coordinate data at a sampling rate of 60 Hz. These data were subsequently filtered and used to calculate the magnitude of the left and right Q angles. RESULTS: A repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that when measured statically, Q angles differed significantly between stance positions (P <.001) and limbs (P <.05). Depending on the stance adopted, mean Q angles varied from 7.2 degrees to 12.7 degrees and 11.0 degrees to 16.1 degrees in the left and right lower limbs, respectively. Q-angle measurements taken in conjunction with the Romberg foot position most closely resembled those gathered with the feet in a self-selected stance (Pearson r = 0.86 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Q-angle magnitude varies with changes in foot position, increasing or decreasing as the foot rotates internally or externally, respectively. These data demonstrate the need for a standardized foot position for Q-angle measurements.
Authors: Hugo Machado Sanchez; Eliane Gouveia de Morais Sanchez; Mario Antonio Baraúna; Roberto Sérgio de Tavares Canto Journal: Acta Ortop Bras Date: 2014 Impact factor: 0.513
Authors: Hamidreza Naserpour; Julien S Baker; Amir Letafatkar; Giacomo Rossettini; Frédéric Dutheil Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-27 Impact factor: 3.390