Literature DB >> 19452575

Study of the patency of different peritoneal drains used prophylactically in bariatric surgery.

Wilson Salgado Júnior1, Marcelo Martins Macedo Neto, José Sebastião dos Santos, Ajith Kumar Sakarankutty, Reginaldo Ceneviva, Orlando de Castro e Silva.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the performance of different types of abdominal drains used in bariatric surgery.
METHODS: A vertical banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed in 33 morbidly obese patients. Drainage of the peritoneal cavity was performed in each case using three different types of drain selected in a randomized manner: a latex tubular drain, a Watterman tubulolaminar drain, and a silicone channeled drain. Drain permeability, contamination of the drained fluid, ease of handling, and patient discomfort were evaluated postoperatively over a period of 7 d.
RESULTS: The patients with the silicone channeled drain had larger volumes of drainage compared to patients with tubular and tubulolaminar drains between the third and seventh postoperative days. In addition, a lower incidence of discomfort and of contamination with bacteria of a more pathogenic profile was observed in the patients with the silicone channeled drain.
CONCLUSION: The silicone channeled drain was more comfortable and had less chance of occlusion, which is important in the detection of delayed dehiscence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19452575      PMCID: PMC2684599          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.2340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  15 in total

1.  Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.

Authors:  P R Schauer; S Ikramuddin; W Gourash; R Ramanathan; J Luketich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Functional longevity of intraperioneal drains: an experimental evaluation.

Authors:  H M Agrama; J M Blackwood; C S Brown; G W Machiedo; B F Rush
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Prophylactic abdominal drains.

Authors:  P F Nora; R M Vanecko; J J Bransfield
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1972-08

4.  Surgical drainage: an historical perspective.

Authors:  J O Robinson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Early detection and treatment of a leaking gastrojejunostomy following gastric bypass.

Authors:  A Ovnat; J Peiser; H Solomon; I Charuzi
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug

6.  Back to basics--clinical diagnosis in bariatric surgery. Routine drains and upper GI series are unnecessary.

Authors:  Ramsey M Dallal; Linda Bailey; Nissin Nahmias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Management of acute bleeding after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Amir Mehran; Samuel Szomstein; Nathan Zundel; Raul Rosenthal
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  The incidence and significance of early pericardial effusion after open heart surgery.

Authors:  G D Angelini; W J Penny; F el-Ghamary; R R West; E G Butchart; S H Armistead; I M Breckenridge; A H Henderson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Routine upper gastrointestinal Gastrografin swallow after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Thomas L Sims; Mary A Mullican; Elizabeth C Hamilton; David A Provost; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage.

Authors:  J J Raves; M Slifkin; D L Diamond
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  1 in total

1.  Routine abdominal drains after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of 353 patients.

Authors:  Konstantinos Albanopoulos; Leonidas Alevizos; Dimitrios Linardoutsos; Evangelos Menenakos; Konstantinos Stamou; Konstantinos Vlachos; George Zografos; Emmanuel Leandros
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.129

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.