Literature DB >> 6492026

Improving the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening.

R Ellman, J Chamberlain.   

Abstract

A review of 100 cases of invasive cervical cancer was designed to assess what changes in cervical screening services might be most effective in reducing mortality. In 68 cases there had apparently never been screening: no system of individual invitation existed for unscreened women. In 10 cases the last smear was reported as normal over five years earlier: a five-year recall system existed but was inefficient. In 13 cases suspicious cervical smear reports had not been followed up adequately. Two cases might have been diagnosed earlier, in spite of ;normal or inflammatory' smears, if the symptoms had been fully elicited. For the remaining seven cases one or more smear was reported as normal within five years of diagnosis of invasive cancer. Overall, 15 cases might have been picked up earlier if suitable opportunities for screening which did arise had been exploited. It was concluded that a substantial proportion of these 100 women might have received treatment at an earlier stage solely by the rigorous implementation of the present screening policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6492026      PMCID: PMC1959890     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  10 in total

1.  Cohort mortality from carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  G B Hill; A M Adelstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1967-09-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Cancer of the cervix: a sexually transmitted infection?

Authors:  V Beral
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Does screening by "Pap" smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study.

Authors:  E A Clarke; T W Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-07-07       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia.

Authors:  D A Boyes; B Morrison; E G Knox; G J Draper; A B Miller
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 0.825

5.  False-negative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed.

Authors:  N D Morell; J R Taylor; R N Snyder; H K Ziel; A Saltz; S Willie
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Cervical cytology histories of 100 women with invasive carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  C D Holman; A J McCartney; K L Hyde; B K Armstrong
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1981-11-28       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Women with positive cervical smears but without surgical intervention. A follow-up study.

Authors:  L J Kinlen; A I Spriggs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Iceland 1965--1978.

Authors:  G Johannesson; G Geirsson; N Day; H Tulinius
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  The relationship of cervical cytology to the incidence of invasive cervical cancer and mortality in Alameda County, California, 1960 to 1974.

Authors:  J E Dunn; V Schweitzer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-04-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Evaluation of mass screening programmes for cervical cancer in N.E. Scotland.

Authors:  J E Macgregor
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1976 May-Jun
  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Problems of follow-up for abnormal cervical smears: discussion paper.

Authors:  R Ellman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Making cervical screening work.

Authors:  A Smith; A Elkind; A Eardley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-06-24

3.  False negative rate in cervical cytology.

Authors:  Y van der Graaf; G P Vooijs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Cervical screening.

Authors:  A McPherson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-05

5.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  M Pierce; S Lundy; A Palanisamy; S Winning; J King
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-15

6.  Diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in general practice.

Authors:  D B Johnson; C J Rowlands
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-28

7.  Cervical cancer screening and registration--are they working?

Authors:  A Choyce; B R McAvoy
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Can health education increase uptake of cervical smear testing among Asian women?

Authors:  B R McAvoy; R Raza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-06

9.  Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme.

Authors:  P Meadows
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-11

10.  Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group.

Authors:  P D Sasieni; J Cuzick; E Lynch-Farmery
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.