Literature DB >> 6479686

Endoscopic measurement of oesophageal transmucosal potential difference in reflux oesophagitis.

B J Collins, R J McFarland, J M Sloan, A H Love.   

Abstract

Oesophageal transmucosal potential difference (PD) was measured in 76 patients during endoscopy. Twelve patients with no symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux, and normal oesophageal appearance on endoscopy and mucosal biopsy had a PD of -18.3 +/- 3.8 mV (mean +/- SD). Thirty three patients had reflux symptoms but the oesophagus appeared normal at endoscopy. Eighteen of these patients had reflux change on oesophageal suction biopsies and the PD in the same region of the oesophagus in this group was -18.1 +/- 7.5 mV. In 15 of the patients, mucosal biopsies were normal and the PD in this group was -18.8 +/- 9.9 mV. Thirty one patients had erosive oesophagitis and PD values in this group were markedly reduced. Twenty seven of these patients had PD values less than -10 mV. We conclude that PD measured by our technique is abnormal in erosive oesophagitis but that it is of no value in the diagnosis of mild mucosal damage in patients with reflux symptoms when endoscopic findings are normal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6479686      PMCID: PMC1432540          DOI: 10.1136/gut.25.10.1103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  21 in total

1.  Histologic abnormalities in reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  J Behar; D Sheahan
Journal:  Arch Pathol       Date:  1975-07

2.  Measurement of bile damage to the gastric mucosa. The relation between the electrical potential difference and transmucosal movement of hydrogen and sodium ion.

Authors:  R B Black; J Rhodes; D Hole
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1973-05

3.  Effect of luminal ions on the transepithelial electrical potential difference of human rectum.

Authors:  E Q Archampong; C J Edmonds
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man.

Authors:  F Ismail-Beigi; P F Horton; C E Pope
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Measurement of gastrointestinal transmural electric potential difference in man.

Authors:  M G Geall; C F Code; D C McIlrath; W H Summerskill
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Reference electrode sites in determination of potential difference across the gastroesophageal mucosal junction.

Authors:  R N Grantham; C F Code; J F Schlegel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Gastroesophageal transmural potential difference measured by a new constant infusion method. The effect of skin scarification on this potential difference.

Authors:  N A Hernandez; I T Beck
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1969-03

8.  Transmural potential difference in patients with hiatus hernia and oesophageal ulcer.

Authors:  I T Beck; N A Hernandez
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Profile of pH, pressure, and potential difference at gastroduodenal junction in man.

Authors:  S Andersson; M I Grossman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Effect of several drugs on gastric potential difference in man.

Authors:  H S Murray; M P Strottman; A R Cooke
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.