Literature DB >> 5069733

Effect of luminal ions on the transepithelial electrical potential difference of human rectum.

E Q Archampong, C J Edmonds.   

Abstract

Skin electrodes are the most convenient reference electrodes for clinical measurements of electrical potential differences (pd) across the epithelium of the alimentary tract but the presence of an electrical charge on normal skin introduces an error. In the present study, by comparison with results obtained using subcutaneous and intravenous electrodes, it was shown that an intradermal injection of saline abolished the skin potential differences. This simple method, therefore, allows skin electrodes to be used to measure the true transepithelial potential differences of gut mucosa. The method was applied to investigate the effect on the rectal potential difference of altering the composition of the luminal solutions. Changes in the cations (sodium, potassium, magnesium) showed that sodium was the most important cationic determinant of the potential difference, especially when sodium absorption was stimulated by giving mineralocorticoids. Changes in the anions (chloride, iodide, bromide, nitrate, bicarbonate, sulphate, phosphate, citrate, and acetate) indicated that the molecular size of the anion rather than its chemical nature was the significant factor and suggested that the ions had to cross a barrier relatively impermeable to anions of radius greater than 3.5 to 4 A degrees . Changes in osmolality and glucose concentration were without effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1972        PMID: 5069733      PMCID: PMC1412282          DOI: 10.1136/gut.13.7.559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  22 in total

1.  Active sodium transport by the colon of Bufo marinus: stimulation by aldosterone and antidiuretic hormone.

Authors:  G Cofré; J Crabbé
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Electrical potentials of the sigmoid colon and rectum in irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  C J Edmonds
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Mechanism of action of aldosterone.

Authors:  G W Sharp; A Leaf
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Reference electrode sites in determination of potential difference across the gastroesophageal mucosal junction.

Authors:  R N Grantham; C F Code; J F Schlegel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  The transmucosal electrical potential difference across the human rectum in vivo following perfusion of different electrolyte solutions.

Authors:  M Dalmark
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Profile of pH, pressure, and potential difference at gastroduodenal junction in man.

Authors:  S Andersson; M I Grossman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Absorption and secretion of electrolytes and water by the human colon, with particular reference to benign adenoma and papilloma.

Authors:  R Shields
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Sodium transport and short-circuit current in rat colon in vivo and the effect of aldosterone.

Authors:  C J Edmonds; J Marriott
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  THE ABSORPTION OF WATER, SODIUM, AND POTASSIUM IN THE LARGE INTESTINE WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE EFFECTS OF VILLOUS PAPILLOMAS.

Authors:  H L DUTHIE; J D ATWELL
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1963-12       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Na, Cl, and water transport by rat colon.

Authors:  P F CURRAN; G F SCHWARTZ
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Electrical potential difference of colonic mucosa.

Authors:  C J Edmonds
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Exoelectrogenic capacity of host microbiota predicts lymphocyte recruitment to the gut.

Authors:  Aaron Conrad Ericsson; Daniel John Davis; Craig Lawrence Franklin; Catherine Elizabeth Hagan
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Electrical potential difference, sodium absorption and potassium secretion by the human rectum during carbenoxolone therapy.

Authors:  A M Tomkins; C J Edmonds
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The effects of aspirin, ethanol, indomethacin and 9alpha-fludrocortisone on buccal mucosal potential difference.

Authors:  G J Huston
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Adrenergic influences on the electrical potential across the colonic mucosa of the rabbit.

Authors:  R J Lennane; W S Peart; J Shaw
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  A comparison of some extra-renal effects of spironolactone and canrenone.

Authors:  G J Huston; E A Al-Dujaili
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Electrical potential difference and sodium and potassium fluxes across rectal mucosa in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  C J Edmonds; D Pilcher
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The effect of cathartic agents on transmucosal electrical potential difference in the human rectum.

Authors:  K Ewe; R Wanitschke
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1980-03-17

9.  Electrical potential difference and absorption of water, sodium, and potassium by the terminal ileum of ileostomy patients.

Authors:  J P de Moraes-Filho; C Salas-Coll; L Blendis; C J Edmonds
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Spironolactone in essential hypertension: evidence against its effect through mineralocorticoid antagonism.

Authors:  B I Hoffbrand; C J Edmonds; T Smith
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.