Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Gastroesophageal transmural potential difference measured by a new constant infusion method. The effect of skin scarification on this potential difference.

× No keyword cloud information.

11 in total

1. ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS AND INTERPRETATION OF SKIN POTENTIALS. TECHN DOCUM REP SAM-TDR-63-95.

Authors: R EDELBERG
Journal: Tech Doc Rep U S Air Force Syst Command Electron Syst Div Date: 1963-11

2. IDENTIFICATION OF THE GASTROESOPHAGEAL MUCOSAL JUNCTION BY TRANSMUCOSAL POTENTIAL IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS WITH HIATAL HERNIA.

Authors: W J HELM; J F SCHLEGEL; C F CODE; W H SUMMERSKILL
Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1965-01 Impact factor: 22.682

3. Factors affecting the electrical potential of the gastric mucosa.

Authors: H V RICE; R T ROSS
Journal: Am J Physiol Date: 1947-04

4. Factors influencing the continuous recording of in situ pH of gastric and duodenal contents.

Authors: R A ROVELSTAD; C A OWEN; T B MAGATH
Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1952-04 Impact factor: 22.682

5. Production of potassium-induced gastrointestinal lesions in monkeys.

Authors: R M Diener; D H Shoffstall; A E Earl
Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 1965-09 Impact factor: 4.219

6. Esophagoscopic cinematography and biopsy through a new fiberoptic insert adapted to the Hufford esophagoscope.

Authors: I T Beck
Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1969-05 Impact factor: 9.427

7. Profile of pH, pressure, and potential difference at gastroduodenal junction in man.

Authors: S Andersson; M I Grossman
Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1965-10 Impact factor: 22.682

8. Correlation of electric surface potentials, intraluminal pressures, and nature of tissue in the gastroesophageal junction of man.

Authors: K J Meckeler; F J Ingelfinger
Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1967-06 Impact factor: 22.682

9. Quantitation of lower esophageal sphincter competence.

Authors: C S Winans; L D Harris
Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1967-05 Impact factor: 22.682

10. The pressure inversion point: its genesis and reliability.

Authors: L D Harris; C E Pope
Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1966-11 Impact factor: 22.682

7 in total

1. Transmural potential difference (PD) in the body of the esophagus in patients with esophagitis, Barrett's epithelium and carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors: E I Vidins; J A Fox; I T Beck
Journal: Am J Dig Dis Date: 1971-11

2. Possible pathogenesis of motility changes in diffuse esophageal spasm associated with gastric carcinoma.

Authors: H A Serebro; B Venkatachalam; R S Prentice; H W Neuman; I T Beck
Journal: Can Med Assoc J Date: 1970-06-06 Impact factor: 8.262

3. Transmural potential difference at the level of the upper esophageal sphincter in man.

Authors: I T Beck; T F McElligott; N A Hernandez
Journal: Am J Dig Dis Date: 1969-07

4. Evaluation of electrical potential difference across gastric mucosa in patients with chronic gastritis according to site, histology, and degree of inflammation.

Authors: J Cutin; H Haase; M A Moura
Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 1987-03 Impact factor: 3.199

Gastroesophageal transmural potential difference measured by a new constant infusion method. The effect of skin scarification on this potential difference.