Literature DB >> 6427417

The biology and treatment of superficial bladder cancer.

F M Torti, B L Lum.   

Abstract

Management of the superficial bladder cancer patient consists of two complementary but separate therapeutic goals: treatment of the existing tumor(s) and prevention of tumor recurrence. At present, the stage, grade, and multicentricity are the major determinants in the natural and therapeutic history of the disease. Although intravesical instillation of chemotherapeutic agents has been used for greater than 20 years, neither its exact role nor the optimal dose or schedule of administration have been established. To date, no dramatic differences in efficacy between the agents commonly used for intravesical chemotherapy, either as definitive therapy or prophylaxis, have been appreciated. These agents do appear to lower the recurrence rate as well as extend the disease-free interval. Since the most thorough experience is with thiotepa, it is the drug against which other agents should be compared in terms of both efficacy and toxicologic evaluation. Different administration schedules and methodologies need further study, such as the utility of continuous bladder irrigation, the use of sequential chemotherapeutic agents to gain cell synchronization, and the use of multiple drug regimens. Because there are multiple factors that influence the occurrence and recurrence of bladder cancer, combined modality therapy deserves testing. Modes of therapy that could be used together because they act through different mechanisms are intravesical chemotherapy, radioactive needle implants, carcinogen modifiers such as pyridoxine, chemoprotective agents such as retinoic acid, and immune stimulants such as BCG. These studies should be performed in a randomized prospective controlled fashion, which may require cooperative multi-institutional involvement to accrue adequate numbers of patients. At this time there are a number of important questions that remain to be answered concerning the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: (1) does this mode of therapy affect overall survival, (2) does prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy alter the incidence of subsequent muscle invasive disease, (3) does intravesical chemotherapy alter the sites, incidence, or responsiveness to systemic chemotherapy of subsequent metastatic disease, and (4) and what is the optimal timing and duration of prophylactic therapy from a cost-effectiveness standpoint?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6427417     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.5.505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  26 in total

1.  Approaches to the treatment of bladder cancer at Stanford.

Authors:  F M Torti
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors enhance chemotherapy killing in gastrointestinal/genitourinary cancer cells.

Authors:  Laurence Booth; Jane L Roberts; Nichola Cruickshanks; Adam Conley; David E Durrant; Anindita Das; Paul B Fisher; Rakesh C Kukreja; Steven Grant; Andrew Poklepovic; Paul Dent
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 3.  Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  The prognostic value of basement membrane morphology, tumour histology and morphometry in superficial bladder cancer.

Authors:  P K Lipponen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  UHRF1 is a novel molecular marker for diagnosis and the prognosis of bladder cancer.

Authors:  M Unoki; J D Kelly; D E Neal; B A J Ponder; Y Nakamura; R Hamamoto
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  The value of tumour spread, grading and growth pattern as morphological predictive parameters in bladder carcinoma. A critical revision of the 1987 TNM classification.

Authors:  J C Angulo; J I Lopez; N Flores; J D Toledo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Bladder cancer angiogenesis, its role in recurrence, stage progression and as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  J P Crew; T S O'Brien; A L Harris
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  Intravesical chemotherapy: combination with dimethyl sulfoxide does not enhance cytotoxicity in vitro.

Authors:  L Walker; M C Walker; C N Parris; J R Masters
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1988

9.  Intravesical idarubicin--a phase-I study.

Authors:  W Schultze-Seemann; K Mross; K Burk; H Sommerkamp
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1994

10.  CD10 expression in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Burak Bahadir; Kemal Behzatoglu; Sibel Bektas; Erol R Bozkurt; Sukru O Ozdamar
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.