Literature DB >> 8335677

The value of tumour spread, grading and growth pattern as morphological predictive parameters in bladder carcinoma. A critical revision of the 1987 TNM classification.

J C Angulo, J I Lopez, N Flores, J D Toledo.   

Abstract

A group of 343 patients with bladder carcinomas was uniformly staged, both clinico-radiologically and pathologically. In accordance with pathological staging, they were treated from 1983 to 1990 and follow-up was closed on January 1992. No systemic chemotherapy regime was used. The present study was designed to assess the value of classical morphological parameters (tumour extension, histological subtype, grade and growth pattern) in the prediction of prognosis, and also to evaluate the adequacy of the current TNM classification (4th edition, 1987) of bladder cancer. The initial tumour stage appears the most useful criterion in the prediction of prognosis. Nevertheless, survival analysis confirms the necessity to modify the present TNM classification for routine clinical practice. In fact, stage III proves to be heterogeneous, and the difference in survival between categories pT3a and pT3b is even more statistically significant (log-rank P < 0.01) than the difference between pT2 and pT3 as a whole (log-rank P < 0.02). Consequently, invasion of the muscular layer should be reclassified into a common stage II, equivalent to the B category in the ABCD system. Moreover, stage IV is also heterogeneous in terms of survival. Despite the overall life-expectancy being rather poor for a patient with bladder carcinoma, three subsets with different prognosis (log-rank P < 0.001) can be identified: pT4N0M0; pTxN1-3M0; pTxNyM1, where x and y represent any number. Therefore, we believe that various subgroups should be distinguished in a future edition of the TNM classification. Current treatment modalities, involving the role of systemic chemotherapy and aimed at bladder preservation, make such innovations even more convenient for a new edition of the TNM classification of bladder cancer. Apart from tumour staging, several microscopic morphological parameters are valuable in distinguishing patients with different prognosis. Pure transitional-cell histology, papillar growth, and low grade, are favourable data. In fact, tumour grade, although somewhat subjective, is a factor of major prognostic importance. Pauwels' distinction of intermedium grade 2 into 2A and 2B is also helpful in the assessment of a population of "intermediate" prognosis. Similarly, with regard to superficial tumours, the division of infiltration levels of subepithelial connective tissue into "superficial" or "deep into the muscularis mucosae", is also relevant, even after stratification by grade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8335677     DOI: 10.1007/bf01372721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  74 in total

1.  NATURAL HISTORY AND CLINICAL BEHAVIOR OF IN SITU CARCINOMA OF THE HUMAN URINARY BLADDER.

Authors:  M R MELAMED; N G VOUTSA; H GRABSTALD
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1964-12       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  A STUDY OF 365 CASES OF INFILTRATING BLADDER CANCER: RELATION OF CERTAIN PATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS TO PROGNOSIS AFTER EXTIRPATION.

Authors:  H J JEWETT; L R KING; W M SHELLEY
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1964-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  TNM classification of urological tumours in 1988.

Authors:  G D Chisholm
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1988-12

4.  Factors influencing the survival of patients with transitional cell tumours of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  J P Pryor
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1973-12

Review 5.  Radiotherapy and chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer with potential bladder sparing.

Authors:  D S Kaufman; W U Shipley; A F Althausen
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.722

6.  The role of flow cytometry in the management of bladder cancer.

Authors:  P J Walther
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 7.  The biology and treatment of superficial bladder cancer.

Authors:  F M Torti; B L Lum
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Five-year follow-up results of a collaborative study of therapies for carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  N H Slack; I D Bross; G R Prout
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  The value of morphometry and DNA flow cytometry in addition to classic prognosticators in superficial urinary bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  E C Blomjous; N W Schipper; J P Baak; W Vos; H J De Voogt; C J Meijer
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Bladder cancer: factors affecting survival.

Authors:  A S Narayana; S A Loening; D J Slymen; D A Culp
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  Growth pattern in superficial urothelial bladder carcinomas. Histological review and clinical relevance.

Authors:  José I López; Javier C Angulo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  DNA Methylation and Urological Cancer, a Step Towards Personalized Medicine: Current and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Jose I López; Santiago Ropero
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Detection of Intratumor Heterogeneity in Modern Pathology: A Multisite Tumor Sampling Perspective.

Authors:  Jesús M Cortés; Giovanni de Petris; José I López
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-03-06

4.  Differences in Pathologic Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT) according to Institution Performing the Initial TURBT: Comparative Analyses between Referred and Nonreferred Group.

Authors:  Hyeong Dong Yuk; Jung Kwon Kim; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Urotensin II receptor determines prognosis of bladder cancer regulating cell motility/invasion.

Authors:  Renato Franco; Silvia Zappavigna; Vincenzo Gigantino; Amalia Luce; Monica Cantile; Margherita Cerrone; Gaetano Facchini; Sisto Perdonà; Sandro Pignata; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Sergio Chieffi; Giovanni Vitale; Marco De Sio; Alessandro Sgambato; Gerardo Botti; Ali Munaim Yousif; Ettore Novellino; Paolo Grieco; Michele Caraglia
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.