Literature DB >> 6425504

Detergent sensitivity and splitting of isolated liver gap junctions.

C K Manjunath, G E Goings, E Page.   

Abstract

Isolated rat liver gap junctions were split by two methods. In the first method, isolated gap junctions were stabilized by cross-linking their cytoplasmic surfaces with glutaraldehyde under conditions that prevented the entry of glutaraldehyde into the "gap" region. The "stabilized" junctions were then split in the junctional gap with SDS. In the second procedure, unfixed gap junctions were split by incubation in urea-containing solutions. Junctional splitting was monitored by electron microscopy of thin sectioned and freeze fractured membrane pellets. Sidedness of the split junctional membranes was defined by labeling their cytoplasmic surfaces with glutaraldehyde-activated ferritin before splitting with urea. Gap junctional splitting did not result in any loss of protein components as determined by SDS-gel electrophoresis. The glutaraldehyde cross-linking procedure was also used to determine the effects of various detergents on the protein-protein interactions in the "gap" region. Of the detergents tested, only SDS caused junctional splitting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6425504     DOI: 10.1007/bf01869201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Membr Biol        ISSN: 0022-2631            Impact factor:   1.843


  28 in total

1.  Preparation of hepatic gap (communicating) junctions. Identification of the constituent polypeptide subunits.

Authors:  J G Culvenor; W H Evans
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1977-12-15       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel.

Authors:  W R Loewenstein
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Liver gap junctions and lens fiber junctions: comparative analysis and calmodulin interaction.

Authors:  E L Hertzberg; N B Gilula
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1982

5.  Independent lines of evidence suggesting a major gap junctional protein with a molecular weight of 26,000.

Authors:  M Finbow; S B Yancey; R Johnson; J P Revel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Isolation and protein composition of gap junctions from rabbit hearts.

Authors:  C K Manjunath; G E Goings; E Page
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1982-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Isolation of mouse myocardial gap junctions.

Authors:  R W Kensler; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Two improved methods for preparing ferritin-protein conjugates for electron microscopy.

Authors:  Y Kishida; B R Olsen; R A Berg; D J Prockop
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Gap junction structures. IV. Asymmetric features revealed by low-irradiation microscopy.

Authors:  T S Baker; D L Caspar; C J Hollingshead; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Comparative analysis of the major polypeptides from liver gap junctions and lens fiber junctions.

Authors:  E L Hertzberg; D J Anderson; M Friedlander; N B Gilula
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  13 in total

1.  Three-dimensional structure of the gap junction connexon.

Authors:  G Perkins; D Goodenough; G Sosinsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Cross-linking of cardiac gap junction connexons by thiol/disulfide exchanges.

Authors:  E Dupont; A el Aoumari; J P Briand; C Fromaget; D Gros
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Preparation, characterization, and structure of half gap junctional layers split with urea and EGTA.

Authors:  S Ghoshroy; D A Goodenough; G E Sosinsky
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Structure of the extracellular surface of the gap junction by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  J H Hoh; G E Sosinsky; J P Revel; P K Hansma
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Altered formation of hemichannels and gap junction channels caused by C-terminal connexin-32 mutations.

Authors:  C Castro; J M Gómez-Hernandez; K Silander; L C Barrio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Connexin 43 enhances the adhesivity and mediates the invasion of malignant glioma cells.

Authors:  Jane H C Lin; Takahiro Takano; Maria Luisa Cotrina; Gregory Arcuino; Jian Kang; Shujun Liu; Qun Gao; Li Jiang; Fanshu Li; Hella Lichtenberg-Frate; Sandra Haubrich; Klaus Willecke; Steven A Goldman; Maiken Nedergaard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Proteolysis of cardiac gap junctions during their isolation from rat hearts.

Authors:  C K Manjunath; G E Goings; E Page
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Isolation and characterization of gap junctions from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J S Ryerse
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Rat heart gap junctions as disulfide-bonded connexon multimers: their depolymerization and solubilization in deoxycholate.

Authors:  C K Manjunath; E Page
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.843

10.  Adhesive properties of connexin hemichannels.

Authors:  M L Cotrina; J H-C Lin; M Nedergaard
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.