Literature DB >> 6390827

The detrimental effects of delayed graft function in cadaver donor renal transplantation.

F Sanfilippo, W K Vaughn, E K Spees, B A Lucas.   

Abstract

Data collected prospectively on over 3800 cadaveric renal transplants performed between June 1977 and July 1982 by the 41 member institutions of the South-Eastern Organ Procurement Foundation were analyzed to determine the influence of delayed graft function (DGF) on patient and graft outcome. Approximately 35% of first graft recipients and 47% of regrafted patients were found to have DGF, as determined by the necessity for dialysis at one week posttransplant. First-graft recipients with DGF tended to include more black recipients, patients with higher peak levels of panel reactive antibody (PRA), less use of antilymphocyte serum (ALS) posttransplant, slightly longer organ preservation times and the more frequent use of organs by ice alone. Multivariate (Cox) regression analysis considering DGF simultaneously with ten other potentially confounding variables showed a highly significant association between DGF and overall graft loss from all causes (P less than 10(-5], irreversible graft rejection (P less than 0.001) as well as patient death (P = 0.012). The differences in graft survival between first graft recipients with DGF (n = 961) versus those without DGF (n = 1769) at one and four years posttransplant were 46% +/- 2 vs. 60% +/- 1 and 28% +/- 3 vs. 40% +/- 2, respectively. The detrimental effect of DGF was highly significant irrespective of the source of donor organs or the type of preservation used. For first transplant recipients who recovered good graft function by one month following DGF (n = 564), there was a significant decrease in eventual graft survival, as compared with patients who had graft function at one month but no prior history of DGF (n = 1407; P = 0.008). However, patients with history of DGF who had good graft function at six months (n = 361) showed no significant difference in longer-term graft survival when compared with similar patients with good graft function at six months but no history of DGF (n = 912). Interestingly, first transplant recipients with DGF were found to have significantly better graft survival if they had received bilateral native nephrectomy at least one month prior to transplantation. These results indicate that delayed graft function following cadaver donor renal transplantation provides a significant risk for eventual graft and patients survival that is principally manifested during the first six months posttransplant. In addition, patients who recover graft function following DGF appear to also remain at higher risk for early graft loss, while pretransplant bilateral native nephrectomy may afford some protection against the detrimental effects of DGF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6390827     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198412000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  10 in total

Review 1.  Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sri G Yarlagadda; Steven G Coca; Amit X Garg; Mona Doshi; Emilio Poggio; Richard J Marcus; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  The clinical and financial burden of early dialysis after deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Paula M Buchanan; Mark A Schnitzler; David Axelrod; Paolo R Salvalaggio; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  J Nephrol Ther       Date:  2011-11-02

3.  Kidney Transplantation Confers Survival Benefit for Candidates With Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Michelle C Nguyen; Teresa Po-Yu Chiang; Allan B Massie; Sunjae Bae; Jennifer D Motter; Daniel C Brennan; Niraj M Desai; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-07-23

4.  Ischemia/reperfusion injury in human kidney transplantation: an immunohistochemical analysis of changes after reperfusion.

Authors:  D D Koo; K I Welsh; J A Roake; P J Morris; S V Fuggle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Association of lower costs of pulsatile machine perfusion in renal transplantation from expanded criteria donors.

Authors:  P M Buchanan; K L Lentine; T E Burroughs; M A Schnitzler; P R Salvalaggio
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Renal ischemia-reperfusion leads to long term infiltration of activated and effector-memory T lymphocytes.

Authors:  Miguel Ascon; Dolores B Ascon; Manchang Liu; Chris Cheadle; Chaitali Sarkar; Lorraine Racusen; Heitham T Hassoun; Hamid Rabb
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Prediction of delayed graft function after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Claudio Jeldres; Héloïse Cardinal; Alain Duclos; Shahrokh F Shariat; Nazareno Suardi; Umberto Capitanio; Marie-Josèe Hébert; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Clinical applications of optical coherence tomography in urology.

Authors:  Hsing-Wen Wang; Yu Chen
Journal:  Intravital       Date:  2014-04-30

9.  Risk Prediction for Delayed Allograft Function: Analysis of the Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function (DeKAF) Study Data.

Authors:  Arthur J Matas; Erika Helgeson; Ann Fieberg; Robert Leduc; Robert S Gaston; Bertram L Kasiske; David Rush; Lawrence Hunsicker; Fernando Cosio; Joseph P Grande; J Michael Cecka; John Connett; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.385

10.  Pre-transplant CDKN2A expression in kidney biopsies predicts renal function and is a future component of donor scoring criteria.

Authors:  Marc Gingell-Littlejohn; Dagmara McGuinness; Liane M McGlynn; David Kingsmore; Karen S Stevenson; Christian Koppelstaetter; Marc J Clancy; Paul G Shiels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.