Literature DB >> 18925906

Association of lower costs of pulsatile machine perfusion in renal transplantation from expanded criteria donors.

P M Buchanan1, K L Lentine, T E Burroughs, M A Schnitzler, P R Salvalaggio.   

Abstract

Pulsatile machine perfusion (PMP) has been shown to reduce delayed graft function (DGF) in expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. Here, we investigate whether there is a cost benefit associated with PMP utilization in ECD kidney transplants. We analyzed United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data describing Medicare-insured ECD kidney transplant recipients in 1995-2004 (N = 5840). We examined total Medicare payments for transplant hospitalization and annually for 3 years posttransplant according to PMP utilization. After adjusting for other recipient, donor and transplant factors, PMP utilization was associated with a $2130 reduction (p = 0.007) in hospitalization costs. PMP utilization was also associated with lower DGF risk (p < 0.0001). PMP utilization did not predict differences in rejection, graft survival, patient survival, or costs at 1, 2 and 3 years posttransplant. PMP utilization is correlated with lower costs for the transplant hospitalization, which is likely due to the associated reduction in DGF among recipients of PMP kidneys. However, there is no difference in long-term Medicare costs for ECD recipients by PMP utilization. A prospective trial is necessary as it will help determine if the associations seen here are due to PMP utilization and not differences in the population studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18925906      PMCID: PMC2596761          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02412.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  25 in total

Review 1.  Liver and kidney preservation by perfusion.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; Charles J Imber; Peter J Friend
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-02-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The hazards of basing acceptance of cadaveric renal allografts on pulsatile perfusion parameters alone.

Authors:  Christopher J Sonnenday; Matthew Cooper; Edward Kraus; Fred Gage; Christopher Handley; Robert A Montgomery
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic review.

Authors:  Jeremy P Wight; Jim B Chilcott; Mike W Holmes; Naomi Brewer
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 4.  The clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulsatile machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys for transplantation retrieved from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors.

Authors:  J Wight; J Chilcott; M Holmes; N Brewer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant.

Authors:  R A Wolfe; V B Ashby; E L Milford; A O Ojo; R E Ettenger; L Y Agodoa; P J Held; F K Port
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates.

Authors:  Akinlolu O Ojo; Julie A Hanson; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Chike N Okechukwu; Robert A Wolfe; Alan B Leichtman; Lawrence Y Agodoa; Bruce Kaplan; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Payment for living donor (vendor) kidneys: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Arthur J Matas; Mark Schnitzler
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Determinants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: impact of biopsy and machine perfusion.

Authors:  R S Sung; L L Christensen; A B Leichtman; S M Greenstein; D A Distant; J J Wynn; M D Stegall; F L Delmonico; F K Port
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of delayed graft function in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  William D Irish; David A McCollum; Raymond J Tesi; Art B Owen; Daniel C Brennan; Jane E Bailly; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  The expanded criteria donor dilemma in cadaveric renal transplantation.

Authors:  Mark A Schnitzler; James F Whiting; Daniel C Brennan; Grace Lin; Will Chapman; Jeffrey Lowell; Stuart Boxerman; Karen L Hardinger; Zoltan Kalo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  14 in total

1.  Transplantation: Pump it up: conserving a precious resource?

Authors:  Choli Hartono; Manikkam Suthanthiran
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  The economic impact of addressing the organ shortage with clinically high-risk allografts.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Strategies for an Expanded Use of Kidneys From Elderly Donors.

Authors:  María José Pérez-Sáez; Núria Montero; Dolores Redondo-Pachón; Marta Crespo; Julio Pascual
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Machine perfusion in solid organ transplantation: where is the benefit?

Authors:  Helge Bruns; Peter Schemmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Opportunities and challenges of expanded criteria organs in liver and kidney transplantation as a response to organ shortage.

Authors:  Harvey Solomon
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

6.  Costs and Outcomes of Privately-Insured Kidney Transplant Recipients by Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Patrick M Ercole; Paula M Buchanan; Krista L Lentine; Thomas E Burroughs; Mark A Schnitzler; Kian A Modanlou
Journal:  J Nephrol Ther       Date:  2012-01-18

7.  [Ten years of the Eurotransplant senior program : are there still age limits for kidney transplantation?].

Authors:  M Giessing
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  The Changing Financial Landscape of Renal Transplant Practice: A National Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  D A Axelrod; M A Schnitzler; H Xiao; A S Naik; D L Segev; V R Dharnidharka; D C Brennan; K L Lentine
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Case mix, quality and high-cost kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  M J Englesbe; J B Dimick; Z Fan; O Baser; J D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Early Allograft Dysfunction Increases Hospital Associated Costs After Liver Transplantation-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Simon Moosburner; Igor M Sauer; Frank Förster; Thomas Winklmann; Joseph Maria George Vernon Gassner; Paul V Ritschl; Robert Öllinger; Johann Pratschke; Nathanael Raschzok
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2020-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.