Literature DB >> 19829730

Prediction of delayed graft function after renal transplantation.

Claudio Jeldres1, Héloïse Cardinal, Alain Duclos, Shahrokh F Shariat, Nazareno Suardi, Umberto Capitanio, Marie-Josèe Hébert, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Delayed graft function (DGF), defined as the need for dialysis during the first week after renal transplantation, is an important adverse clinical outcome. A previous model relied on 16 variables to quantify the risk of DGF, thereby undermining its clinical usefulness. We explored the possibility of developing a simpler, equally accurate and more user-friendly paradigm for renal transplant recipients from deceased donors.
METHODS: Logistic regression analyses addressed the occurrence of DGF in 532 renal transplant recipients from deceased donors. Predictors consisted of recipient age, gender, race, weight, number of HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR mismatches, maximum and last titre of panel reactive antibodies, donor age and cold ischemia time. Accuracy was quantified with the area under the curve. Two hundred bootstrap resamples were used for internal validation.
RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 103 patients (19.4%). Recipient weight (p < 0.001), panel of reactive antibodies (p < 0.001), donor age (p < 0.001), cold ischemia time (p = 0.005) and HLA-DR mismatches (p = 0.05) represented independent predictors. The multivariable nomogram relying on 6 predictors was 74.3% accurate in predicting the probability of DGF.
CONCLUSION: Our simple and user-friendly model requires 6 variables and is at least equally accurate (74%) to the previous nomogram (71%). We demonstrate that DGF can be accurately predicted in different populations with this new model.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19829730      PMCID: PMC2758516          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  20 in total

1.  Initial biopsy outcome prediction--head-to-head comparison of a logistic regression-based nomogram versus artificial neural network.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Markus Graefen; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Gallina; Julia Hopp; Michael W Kattan; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Factors predicting duration of delayed graft function in non-heart-beating donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  J Asher; C Wilson; M Gok; S Balupuri; A A Bhatti; N Soomro; D Rix; B Jaques; D Manas; B Shenton; D Talbot
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Utility of a mathematical nomogram to predict delayed graft function: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Jonathan A Grossberg; Steven E Reinert; Anthony P Monaco; Reginald Gohh; Paul E Morrissey
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Clinicians are most familiar with nomograms and rate their clinical usefulness highest, look-up tables are second best.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Claudio Jeldres; Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments.

Authors:  M Mazumdar; J R Glassman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Kidney paired donation and optimizing the use of live donor organs.

Authors:  Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry; Daniel S Warren; Brigitte Reeb; Robert A Montgomery
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Predicting nonsentinel node status after positive sentinel lymph biopsy for breast cancer: clinicians versus nomogram.

Authors:  Michelle C Specht; Michael W Kattan; Mithat Gonen; Jane Fey; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Compliance and noncompliance in patients with a functioning renal transplant: a multicenter study.

Authors:  S Greenstein; B Siegal
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Major effects of delayed graft function and cold ischaemia time on renal allograft survival.

Authors:  Isabel Quiroga; Philip McShane; Dicken D H Koo; Derek Gray; Peter J Friend; Susan Fuggle; Christopher Darby
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 10.  Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Norberto Perico; Dario Cattaneo; Mohamed H Sayegh; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Nov 13-19       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of kidney organ quality and prediction of outcome at time of transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas F Mueller; Kim Solez; Valeria Mas
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 9.623

2.  Predictive model for delayed graft function based on easily available pre-renal transplant variables.

Authors:  Gianluigi Zaza; Pietro Manuel Ferraro; Gianpaolo Tessari; Silvio Sandrini; Maria Piera Scolari; Irene Capelli; Enrico Minetti; Loreto Gesualdo; Giampiero Girolomoni; Giovanni Gambaro; Antonio Lupo; Luigino Boschiero
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Delayed graft function and its management in children.

Authors:  Ryszard Grenda
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  A novel genomic model for predicting the likelihood of delayed graft function in DCD kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Bin Yu; Han Liang; Shujun Zhou; Qifa Ye; Yanfeng Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

5.  Vasopressor selection during critical care management of brain dead organ donors and the effects on kidney graft function.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Swanson; Madhukar S Patel; Tahnee Groat; Nora E Jameson; Margaret K M Ellis; Michael P Hutchens; Claus U Niemann; Darren J Malinoski; Mitchell B Sally
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.697

6.  PREventing Delayed Graft Function by Driving Immunosuppressive InduCtion Treatment (PREDICT-DGF): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marion Chapal; Yohann Foucher; Monique Marguerite; Karine Neau; Emmanuelle Papuchon; Pascal Daguin; Emmanuel Morélon; Georges Mourad; Elisabeth Cassuto; Marc Ladrière; Christophe Legendre; Magali Giral
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Kinetic Estimation of GFR Improves Prediction of Dialysis and Recovery after Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Timothy J Pianta; Zoltan H Endre; John W Pickering; Nicholas A Buckley; Philip W Peake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Risk Prediction for Delayed Allograft Function: Analysis of the Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function (DeKAF) Study Data.

Authors:  Arthur J Matas; Erika Helgeson; Ann Fieberg; Robert Leduc; Robert S Gaston; Bertram L Kasiske; David Rush; Lawrence Hunsicker; Fernando Cosio; Joseph P Grande; J Michael Cecka; John Connett; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.385

9.  Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplants: Time Evolution, Role of Acute Rejection, Risk Factors, and Impact on Patient and Graft Outcome.

Authors:  Martin Chaumont; Judith Racapé; Nilufer Broeders; Fadoua El Mountahi; Annick Massart; Thomas Baudoux; Jean-Michel Hougardy; Dimitri Mikhalsky; Anwar Hamade; Alain Le Moine; Daniel Abramowicz; Pierre Vereerstraeten
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2015-09-10

Review 10.  Acute kidney injury: preclinical innovations, challenges, and opportunities for translation.

Authors:  Samuel A Silver; Héloise Cardinal; Katelyn Colwell; Dylan Burger; Jeffrey G Dickhout
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.