Literature DB >> 6379196

Carcinogen-induced mutation spectrum in wild-type, uvrA and umuC strains of Escherichia coli. Strain specificity and mutation-prone sequences.

N Koffel-Schwartz, J M Verdier, M Bichara, A M Freund, M P Daune, R P Fuchs.   

Abstract

Forward mutations induced by the ultimate carcinogen N-acetoxy-N-2-acetylaminofluorene (N-Aco-AAF) in the tetracycline resistance gene carried on plasmid pBR322 are shown to be dependent upon the induction of the host SOS functions in wild-type and umuC Escherichia coli cells. The mutation frequency in the umuC strain is equal to about 40% of the mutation frequency observed in the umu+ background. In the excision-repair-deficient uvrA mutant strain the mutagenic response is the same as in SOS-induced wild-type cells whether or not the uvrA bacteria are SOS-induced. Equal mutation frequencies are obtained in both the wild-type and the uvrA strains for equal modification levels although the survival of AAF-modified plasmid DNA is greatly reduced in the uvrA strain as compared to the wild-type strain. Sequence analysis of the mutations reveals that more than 90% of the N-Aco-AAF-induced mutations are frameshift mutations. Two types of mutational hotspots are observed occurring either at repetitive sequences or at non-repetitive sequences. Both types of mutants appear at similar locations and frequencies in both the wild-type and the uvrA strains. On the other hand, only the non-repetitive sequence mutants are obtained in the umuC background. These non-repetitive sequence mutants preferentially occur within the sequence 5' G-G-C-G-C-C 3' (the NarI restriction enzyme recognition sequence). The analysis of the -AAF binding spectrum to the same DNA fragment shows that there is no direct correlation between the modification spectrum and the mutation spectrum. We suggest that certain sequences are "mutation-prone" in the sense that only these sequences can be efficiently mutated as the result of an active processing mediated by specific proteins. When a sequence is said to be mutation-prone it probably corresponds to a particular structure that is induced within this sequence as a result of the binding to the DNA of the mutagen. This sequence-specific conformational change is the substrate for the protein(s) that fixes the mutation. The mutagenic processing pathway(s) is part of the cellular response to DNA-damaging agents (the so-called SOS response). Two pathways for frameshift mutagenesis are suggested by the data: an umuC-dependent pathway, which is involved in the mutagenic processing of lesions within repetitive sequences; an umuC-independent pathway responsible for the fixation of mutations within specific non-repetitive sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6379196     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90056-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  58 in total

1.  Mechanism of DNA polymerase II-mediated frameshift mutagenesis.

Authors:  O J Becherel; R P Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Defining the position of the switches between replicative and bypass DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Shingo Fujii; Robert P Fuchs
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Translesion synthesis past the C8- and N2-deoxyguanosine adducts of the dietary mutagen 2-Amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline in the NarI recognition sequence by prokaryotic DNA polymerases.

Authors:  James S Stover; Goutam Chowdhury; Hong Zang; F Peter Guengerich; Carmelo J Rizzo
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Carcinogen-induced frameshift mutagenesis in repetitive sequences.

Authors:  I B Lambert; R L Napolitano; R P Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Polymorphism in N-2-acetylaminofluorene induced DNA structure as revealed by DNase I footprinting.

Authors:  X Veaute; R P Fuchs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Robert P Fuchs; Shingo Fujii
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  NMR evidence of the stabilisation by the carcinogen N-2-acetylaminofluorene of a frameshift mutagenesis intermediate.

Authors:  C Milhé; C Dhalluin; R P Fuchs; J F Lefèvre
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Human and E.coli excinucleases are affected differently by the sequence context of acetylaminofluorene-guanine adduct.

Authors:  D Mu; E Bertrand-Burggraf; J C Huang; R P Fuchs; A Sancar; B P Fuchs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Separation of the SOS-dependent and SOS-independent components of alkylating-agent mutagenesis.

Authors:  L B Couto; I Chaudhuri; B A Donahue; B Demple; J M Essigmann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  DNA adduct-induced stabilization of slipped frameshift intermediates within repetitive sequences: implications for mutagenesis.

Authors:  A Garcia; I B Lambert; R P Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.