Literature DB >> 6378145

One instead of two knives for surgical incision. Does it increase the risk of postoperative wound infection?

P O Hasselgren, E Hagberg, H Malmer, A Säljö, T Seeman.   

Abstract

We evaluated the rate of postoperative wound infection following the use of one or two knives for incision. The infection rate in 277 patients who were operated on with one knife was 3.6%, in 309 patients who were operated on with two knives the rate was 5.5%. This difference was not statistically significant. The limit of a one-sided confidence interval bound from the estimated difference of infection rates in the two groups of patients was 0.94% at a confidence level of 0.95. Thus, if there was any difference at all in favor of two knives with respect to infection, it was probably less than 1%. The present results indicate that the old surgical practice of discarding the skin knife and using a separate scalpel for the deep incision can be abandoned without increasing the risk of wound infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6378145     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390200037009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  4 in total

1.  [Etiology and consequences of postoperative wound infection].

Authors:  M Rogy; R Függer; E Riedl; F Schulz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1991

2.  Changing knives a wasteful and unnecessary ritual.

Authors:  R Hill; S Blair; J Neely; M Ramanathan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  A Guide to Improving the Care of Patients with Fragility Fractures, Edition 2.

Authors:  Simon C Mears; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Myths and legends in orthopaedic practice: are we all guilty?

Authors:  Nirmal C Tejwani; Igor Immerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.