Literature DB >> 4004043

Changing knives a wasteful and unnecessary ritual.

R Hill, S Blair, J Neely, M Ramanathan.   

Abstract

The use of two knives for making a surgical incision is a deeply ingrained practice of British surgery and a postal survey of the theatre superintendents in the South-West Thames Region revealed that out of 143 surgeons all but one use this technique. Therefore we undertook a bacteriological study of the knife blades used on a general surgical unit. This showed that under normal conditions pathogenic organisms do not contaminate the knife blade and are not carried into the wound by it. The use of only one knife to make an incision does not increase the incidence of wound infection. A survey of the world literature confirms these findings. The wasteful and unnecessary ritual of using two knives to make an incision through normal skin has no theoretical, scientific or clinical basis and can be discontinued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4004043      PMCID: PMC2498033     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  Bacterial flora of the normal human skin.

Authors:  C A EVANS; W M SMITH; E A JOHNSTON; E R GIBLETT
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Skin knife-deep knife: the ritual and practice of skin incisions.

Authors:  H B Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Location of cutaneous microorganisms.

Authors:  D V Pecora; R E Landis; E Martin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Postoperative wound infection: a computer analysis.

Authors:  A E Davidson; C Clark; G Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A bacteriological study of the immediate environment of a surgical wound.

Authors:  A I Davidson; G Smith; H G Smylie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  One instead of two knives for surgical incision. Does it increase the risk of postoperative wound infection?

Authors:  P O Hasselgren; E Hagberg; H Malmer; A Säljö; T Seeman
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1984-08

7.  The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Incidence of wound infection for common general surgical procedures.

Authors:  B Coles; J A van Heerden; T F Keys; A Haldorson
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1982-04
  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Review of general surgery 1985.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Myths and legends in orthopaedic practice: are we all guilty?

Authors:  Nirmal C Tejwani; Igor Immerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.176

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.