Literature DB >> 1870366

[Etiology and consequences of postoperative wound infection].

M Rogy1, R Függer, E Riedl, F Schulz.   

Abstract

The incidence of postoperative wound infection ranges between 4.6% and 36% after gastrointestinal operations respectively. To evaluate the factors which influence the postoperative wound infection we prospectively analyzed our patients between 1/1989 and 1/1990. 444 patients from three general surgical units of our clinic entered this study. The overall wound infection rate was 6.3%. We classified the patients into 3 operative groups: Group I: subcutaneous operations; Group II: intraabdominal operations without opening the GI-tract; Group III: gastrointestinal operations. Wound infection rate in group I was 1.8%, in group II 7.3% and in group III 13.7%. The differences were highly significant. Both univariate (chi 2-test) as well as a multivariate (Cox-Model) analysis were done. We figured out that classification of patients (p = 0.000), operation time (p = 0.009), operating room (p = 0.000), intensive care unit (p = 0.026), long-term antibiotic prophylaxis (p = 0.001), subcutaneous haematoma (p = 0.000) and length of closed drainage time (p = 0.001) are of significant value. In the Cox model the classification of patients into 3 groups surpassed all the other factors. Postoperative hospital stay was lengthened in patients with wound infection significantly (p = 0.0025).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1870366     DOI: 10.1007/bf00250343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir        ISSN: 0023-8236


  17 in total

1.  Controlled trial of cephradine versus cefuroxime in vascular surgery.

Authors:  I W Barlow; J R Ausobsky; D Wilkinson; R C Kester
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Res       Date:  1989

2.  [Postoperative wound infections in surgery of stomach cancer. A bacteriologic analysis].

Authors:  V W Widow; W Röthig; R Wilhelm
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 0.942

3.  Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance. Results, advantages, and unanswered questions.

Authors:  M M Olson; J T Lee
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-06

4.  [Effect of time of operation and clinic organization on postoperative complications].

Authors:  R Grundmann; U Szillat
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1989

Review 5.  [Immune depression as a reaction to surgical operations--its significance for postoperative infection].

Authors:  B Eiseman; G Schröter
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 0.942

6.  One instead of two knives for surgical incision. Does it increase the risk of postoperative wound infection?

Authors:  P O Hasselgren; E Hagberg; H Malmer; A Säljö; T Seeman
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1984-08

7.  Computer-aided surveillance of surgical infections and identification of risk factors.

Authors:  A Bremmelgaard; D Raahave; R Beier-Holgersen; J V Pedersen; S Andersen; A I Sørensen
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  A randomized prospective study of antibiotic prophylaxis during abdominal surgery.

Authors:  H V Gaskill; B A Levine
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Systemic perioperative prophylaxis in elective oncological colorectal surgery: cefotetan versus clindamicin plus aztreonam.

Authors:  R Bellantone; F Pacelli; L Sofo; G B Doglietto; M Bossola; C Ratto; F Crucitti
Journal:  Drugs Exp Clin Res       Date:  1988

10.  Infections complicating low-risk cesarean sections in community hospitals: efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  N J Ehrenkranz; W C Blackwelder; S J Pfaff; D Poppe; D E Yerg; R A Kaslow
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Splenectomy--a strictly aseptic intervention?].

Authors:  J Stopinski; I Staib; C Jaeschke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.