Literature DB >> 6358086

Hygienic hand disinfection.

M L Rotter.   

Abstract

The purpose of hygienic hand disinfection is to render hands safe after contact with pathogens. Comparing effects of disinfection procedures on infection ratios is too difficult for routine purposes but the degerming efficacy may be determined in laboratory tests with volunteers. In the Vienna test model the efficacy of a specific procedure being tested is compared to that of a standard disinfection (rubbing into hands 3 ml of isopropanol 60% v/v, 30 seconds, twice) tested in parallel with the same volunteers. This ensures standardization, thus comparability of results between laboratories, and provides the investigator with a yardstick for efficacy. The model includes artificial contamination, assessment of the release of test bacteria (E. Coli ATCC 11229) before and after disinfection by the finger tip method, and addition of neutralizers to sampling fluids. Alcohols in appropriate concentrations are highly effective (log reductions: greater than 4.0) whereas procedures employing disinfectant detergents act like soap (log reductions: less than or equal to 3.2) and may cause dissemination of pathogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6358086     DOI: 10.1017/s0195941700058744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control        ISSN: 0195-9417


  8 in total

1.  Quest for a realistic in vivo test method for antimicrobial hand-rub agents: introduction of a low-volume hand contamination procedure.

Authors:  David R Macinga; Christopher M Beausoleil; Esther Campbell; Gayle Mulberry; Ann Brady; Sarah L Edmonds; James W Arbogast
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Pig skin as test substrate for evaluating topical antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  L W Bush; L M Benson; J H White
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Efficacy of alcohol-based hand rinses under frequent-use conditions.

Authors:  E L Larson; P I Eke; B E Laughon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of Commercial Hand Sanitizers Against Human Norovirus Evaluated by an in vivo Fingerpad Method.

Authors:  Blanca I Escudero-Abarca; Rebecca M Goulter; Clyde S Manuel; Rachel A Leslie; Kristen Green; James W Arbogast; Lee-Ann Jaykus
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 5.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Comparison of four antiseptic products containing chlorhexidine gluconate.

Authors:  E L Larson; B E Laughon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Composition and density of microflora in the subungual space of the hand.

Authors:  K J McGinley; E L Larson; J J Leyden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.

Authors:  Judith Tanner; Jo C Dumville; Gill Norman; Mathew Fortnam
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.