Literature DB >> 3093525

Pig skin as test substrate for evaluating topical antimicrobial activity.

L W Bush, L M Benson, J H White.   

Abstract

The feasibility of using pathogen-contaminated pig skin as a model substrate for evaluating skin disinfectants was demonstrated. A test methodology is described that is safe, convenient to use, and adaptable to a variety of hand-washing conditions. The treatment protocol, pathogen contamination conditions, and application technique variables can all be carefully controlled to simulate clinical use conditions. The number of organisms transferred by contact was compared with the total organism count on the pig skin. The quantity of organisms transferred ranged from 10 to 60% of the total organisms, depending on the nature of the contamination conditions. The cumulative results of multiple imprint and stripping measurements were consistent with the concentration of inoculated organisms. Tests with alcohol solutions validated the methodology and clearly showed the dependence of topical antimicrobial activity on both the concentration and structure of the alcohol. Activity increased with increasing alcohol concentration and in the following order: ethanol, isopropanol, and n-propanol. All of the alcohols became less active as the severity of the test conditions was increased, i.e., higher inoculum levels for a longer incubation time before treatment. The contact imprint and stripping methods used to evaluate bacterial growth on the skin clearly showed that the alcohol treatments reduced but did not eliminate the inoculated pathogens. It was found that long lifetimes (several hours) for pathogens on the skin are possible under some environmental conditions. This observation strongly suggests that frequent hand washing is a necessary infection control practice even when opportunities for repeated pathogen contamination have not occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3093525      PMCID: PMC268910          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.24.3.343-348.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  A test for 'hygienic' hand disinfection.

Authors:  G A Ayliffe; J R Babb; A H Quoraishi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Transient skin flora: their removal by cleansing or disinfection in relation to their mode of deposition.

Authors:  H A Lilly; E J Lowbury
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Surgical scrub and skin disinfection.

Authors:  G A Ayliffe
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1984-01

4.  Current handwashing issues.

Authors:  E Larson
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1984-01

5.  Bacteria of porcine skin, xenografts, and treatment with neomycin sulfate.

Authors:  R F Smith; B L Evans
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-02

6.  Hand carriage of aerobic Gram-negative rods by health care personnel.

Authors:  B G Adams; T J Marrie
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1982-08

7.  The skin of domestic mammals as a model for the human skin, with special reference to the domestic pig.

Authors:  W Meyer; R Schwarz; K Neurand
Journal:  Curr Probl Dermatol       Date:  1978

8.  Hygienic hand disinfection.

Authors:  M L Rotter
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1984-01

9.  Hand carriage of aerobic gram-negative rods may not be transient.

Authors:  B G Adams; T J Marrie
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1982-08
  9 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Effect of testing method on apparent activities of antiviral disinfectants and antiseptics.

Authors:  J D Woolwine; J L Gerberding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Assessment of disinfectant efficacy in reducing microbial growth.

Authors:  Abdullah A Alajlan; Lenah E Mukhtar; Adnan S Almussallam; Abdullah M Alnuqaydan; Nasser S Albakiri; Turki F Almutari; Khalid M Bin Shehail; Fahad S Aldawsari; Sulaiman M Alajel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance.

Authors:  G McDonnell; A D Russell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Decolonisation of MRSA, S. aureus and E. coli by cold-atmospheric plasma using a porcine skin model in vitro.

Authors:  Tim Maisch; Tetsuji Shimizu; Yang-Fang Li; Julia Heinlin; Sigrid Karrer; Gregor Morfill; Julia L Zimmermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Injections through skin colonized with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm introduce contamination despite standard antimicrobial preparation procedures.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Valery Leng; Viraj Patel; K Scott Phillips
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of olanexidine gluconate on preoperative skin preparation: an experimental study in cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Hikaru Nakata; Yoshie Tsubotani; Takuya Nii; Akifumi Hagi; Yasuhide Inoue; Tadashi Imamura
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 8.  Hygienic hand antiseptics: should they not have activity and label claims against viruses?

Authors:  Syed A Sattar; V Susan Springthorpe; Jason Tetro; Robert Vashon; Bruce Keswick
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.918

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.