Literature DB >> 632910

Quantitative potentials of dynamic emission computed tomography.

T F Budinger, S E Derenzo, W L Greenberg, G T Gullberg, R H Huesman.   

Abstract

Statistical uncertainties in emission computed tomography were simulated in 60 computer studies involving various numbers of events and distributions of activity. Previous studies have shown that for a uniform disc of activity of rms percentage of uncertainty per resolution cell is: 120 X (number of resolution cells)1/4 X (number of events per resolution cell)- 1/2. In this work we examined the more general situation where one or two regions of uniform activity are surrounded by a uniform background, and found that for an equal number of recorded events the uncertainties were reduced when the activity was concentrated in a portion of the field. The empirical relation rms % uncertainty in nt = 120(N)1/4(nt)-3/4, where nt is the number of events in an average target (organ) resolution cell and N is the total number of events recorded, satisfactorily described the relationships between uncertainties, contrast, total number of detected events, and number of resolution cells for all 60 computer studies. By means of this relation, we show the theoretical possibility of gated cardiac imaging with 20% uncertainty in 1 cm X 1 cm regions, and of 1-sec cerebral blood-flow images with 20% uncertainty in 2 cm X 2 cm regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 632910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  10 in total

1.  Improved positron emission tomography quantification by Fourier-based restoration filtering.

Authors:  J M Links; J P Leal; H W Mueller-Gaertner; H N Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

2.  Properties of noise in positron emission tomography images reconstructed with filtered-backprojection and row-action maximum likelihood algorithm.

Authors:  A Teymurazyan; T Riauka; H-S Jans; D Robinson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Selection of weighting factors for quantification of PET radioligand binding using simplified reference tissue models with noisy input functions.

Authors:  M D Normandin; R A Koeppe; E D Morris
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  The physical performances of a single slice positron tomographic system and preliminary results in a clinical environment.

Authors:  F Soussaline; A E Todd-Pokropek; D Plummer; D Comar; C Loch; S Houle; C Kellershohn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1979-08-01

5.  On estimating the loss of quantification in PET due to finite detector resolution.

Authors:  A N Bice; D F Wong; H N Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1987

6.  Reconstruction of isotope distribution in the brain: error analysis for instrument design.

Authors:  H Rusinek; M Youdin; T Reich
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  System resolution versus image uncertainty for positron emission tomography scanners.

Authors:  Andrej Studen; Neal Clinthorne
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-13

8.  Quantitative comparison between 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD: measurement of arterial input and brain retention.

Authors:  A Pupi; A Castagnoli; M T De Cristofaro; L Bacciottini; A R Petti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-02

9.  Left ventricular cavity-to-myocardium count ratio in exercise and resting technetium-99m-tetrofosmin SPECT: correlation with left ventricular function.

Authors:  P C Li; S S Sun; A Kao; C C Lin; C C Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  A method to assess image quality for Low-dose PET: analysis of SNR, CNR, bias and image noise.

Authors:  Jianhua Yan; Josh Schaefferkoette; Maurizio Conti; David Townsend
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.