Literature DB >> 27271165

The use of ultrasonography and digital mammography in women under 40 years with symptomatic breast cancer: a 7-year Irish experience.

C E Redmond1, G M Healy2, C F Murphy2, A O'Doherty2, A Foster2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer in women under 40 years of age is rare and typically presents symptomatically. The optimal imaging modality for this patient group is controversial. Most women undergo ultrasonography with/without mammography. Young women typically have dense breasts, which can obscure the features of malignancy on film mammography, however, initial studies have suggested that digital mammography may have a more accurate diagnostic performance in younger women. Ultrasound generally performs well in this age group, although it is poor at detecting carcinoma in situ (DCIS). AIMS: To evaluate the comparative diagnostic performance of ultrasonography and digital mammography in the initial diagnostic evaluation of women under 40 years of age with symptomatic breast cancer.
METHODS: Retrospective review of all women under the age of 40 years managed at our symptomatic breast cancer unit from January 2009 to December 2015.
RESULTS: There were 120 patients that met the inclusion criteria for this study. The sensitivity of ultrasonography and digital mammography for breast cancer in this patient group was 95.8 and 87.5 %, respectively. The patients with a false negative mammographic examination were more likely to have dense breasts (p < 0.01). Five patients had a false negative ultrasonographic examination, withal of whom were diagnosed with DCIS detected by mammography.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the superior sensitivity of ultrasound for breast cancer in women under the age of 40 years, however, the results show that digital mammography has an important complimentary role in the comprehensive assessment of these patients, particularly in the diagnosis of DCIS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Mammography; Ultrasonography; Young women

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27271165     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-016-1472-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  19 in total

1.  Imaging inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  J-P Alunni
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.026

2.  MRI features of inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Huong T Le-Petross; Massimo Cristofanilli; Selin Carkaci; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Edward F Jackson; Robyn K Harrell; Brandy J Reed; Wei T Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Stage 0 to stage III breast cancer in young women.

Authors:  C Gajdos; P I Tartter; I J Bleiweiss; C Bodian; S T Brower
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Les Irwig; Judy M Simpson; Merran McKessar; Steven Blome; Jennie Noakes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The diagnosis of breast cancer in women younger than 40.

Authors:  L M Foxcroft; E B Evans; A J Porter
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Diagnostic ultrasonography and mammography for invasive and noninvasive breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years.

Authors:  Tomo Osako; Kaoru Takahashi; Takuji Iwase; Kotaro Iijima; Yumi Miyagi; Seiichiro Nishimura; Keiichiro Tada; Masujiro Makita; Futoshi Akiyama; Goi Sakamoto; Fujio Kasumi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.239

7.  Mammographically occult breast cancer. A pathologic and radiologic study.

Authors:  R Holland; J H Hendriks; M Mravunac
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The Royal College of Radiologists Breast Group breast imaging classification.

Authors:  A J Maxwell; N T Ridley; G Rubin; M G Wallis; F J Gilbert; M J Michell
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 10.  Breast cancer in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  C Shannon; I E Smith
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  4 in total

1.  Imaging Findings and Clinicopathological Correlation of Breast Cancer in Women under 40 Years Old.

Authors:  Gamze Durhan; Aynur Azizova; Ömer Önder; Kemal Kösemehmetoğlu; Jale Karakaya; Meltem Gülsün Akpınar; Figen Demirkazık; Ayşegül Üner
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.

Authors:  Kristina Åhsberg; Anna Gardfjell; Emma Nimeus; Rogvi Rasmussen; Catharina Behmer; Sophia Zackrisson; Lisa Ryden
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 3.  Why the Gold Standard Approach by Mammography Demands Extension by Multiomics? Application of Liquid Biopsy miRNA Profiles to Breast Cancer Disease Management.

Authors:  Pavol Zubor; Peter Kubatka; Karol Kajo; Zuzana Dankova; Hubert Polacek; Tibor Bielik; Erik Kudela; Marek Samec; Alena Liskova; Dominika Vlcakova; Tatiana Kulkovska; Igor Stastny; Veronika Holubekova; Jan Bujnak; Zuzana Laucekova; Dietrich Büsselberg; Mariusz Adamek; Walther Kuhn; Jan Danko; Olga Golubnitschaja
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.

Authors:  Lisa Ryden; Sophia Zackrisson; Kristina Åhsberg; Anna Gardfjell; Emma Nimeus
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.