Literature DB >> 6303041

A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness.

C M Oman.   

Abstract

The etiology of motion sickness is now usually explained in terms of a qualitatively formulated "sensory conflict" hypothesis. By consideration of the information processing task faced by the central nervous system in estimating body spatial orientation and in controlling active body movement using an "internal model" referenced control strategy, a mathematical model for sensory conflict generation is developed. The model incorporates and extends models proposed by von Holst, Held, and Reason, and is congruent with multisensory models for spatial orientation developed by Young and coworkers. The model postulates a major dynamic functional role for sensory conflict signals in movement control, as well as in sensory-motor adaptation. It accounts for the role of active movement in creating motion sickness symptoms in some experimental circumstances, and in alleviating them in others. The relationship between motion sickness produced by "sensory rearrangement" and that resulting from external motion disturbances is explicitly defined. A nonlinear conflict averaging model is proposed which describes dynamic aspects of experimentally observed subjective discomfort sensation, and suggests resulting behaviours. The model admits several possibilities for adaptive mechanisms which do not involve internal model updating. Further systematic efforts to experimentally refine and validate the model are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6303041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0365-5237


  48 in total

1.  Motion sickness induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR).

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Sofronis Sofroniou; Mikhail Kunin; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A distributed, dynamic, parallel computational model: the role of noise in velocity storage.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Mechanisms of human static spatial orientation.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; S Rocca; S Daros; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Space motion sickness.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul Dizio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Prolonged reduction of motion sickness sensitivity by visual-vestibular interaction.

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Ted Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Narayan Ganesan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Incremental adaptation to yaw head turns during 30 RPM centrifugation.

Authors:  Paul Z Elias; Thomas Jarchow; Laurence R Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Active control in interrupted dynamic spatial orientation: the detection of orientation change.

Authors:  J F Larish; G J Andersen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

9.  Spinning versus wobbling: how the brain solves a geometry problem.

Authors:  Jean Laurens; Dominik Strauman; Bernhard J Hess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Cerebellar Prediction of the Dynamic Sensory Consequences of Gravity.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.