Literature DB >> 21632931

Spinning versus wobbling: how the brain solves a geometry problem.

Jean Laurens1, Dominik Strauman, Bernhard J Hess.   

Abstract

Oscillating an animal out-of-phase simultaneously about the roll and pitch axes ("wobble") changes continuously the orientation of the head relative to gravity. For example, it may gradually change from nose-up, to ear-down, nose-down, ear-down, and back to nose-up. Rotations about the longitudinal axis ("spin") can change the orientation of the head relative to gravity in the same way, provided the axis is tilted from vertical. During both maneuvers, the otolith organs in the inner ear detect the change in head orientation relative to gravity, whereas the semicircular canals will only detect oscillations in velocity (wobble), but not any rotation at constant velocity (spin). Geometrically, the whole motion can be computed based on information about head orientation relative to gravity and the wobble velocity. We subjected monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to combinations of spin and wobble and found that the animals were always able to correctly estimate their spin velocity. Simulations of these results with an optimal Bayesian model of vestibular information processing suggest that the brain integrates gravity and velocity information based on a geometrically coherent three-dimensional representation of head-in-space motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21632931      PMCID: PMC6622853          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5900-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  55 in total

Review 1.  Characteristics of the VOR in response to linear acceleration.

Authors:  G D Paige; S H Seidman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-05-28       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Low-frequency otolith and semicircular canal interactions after canal inactivation.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; D M Merfeld; B J Hess
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Inactivation of semicircular canals causes adaptive increases in otolith-driven tilt responses.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Shawn D Newlands; J David Dickman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts.

Authors:  Yair Weiss; Eero P Simoncelli; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Theoretical considerations on canal-otolith interaction and an observer model.

Authors:  Jelte E Bos; Willem Bles
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Nystagmus produced by pitch and yaw rotation of monkeys about non-vertical axes.

Authors:  L R Young; V S Henn
Journal:  Fortschr Zool       Date:  1975

8.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L Zupan; R J Peterka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements.

Authors:  L H Zupan; D M Merfeld; C Darlot
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  10 in total

1.  Gravito-inertial ambiguity resolved through head stabilization.

Authors:  Ildar Farkhatdinov; Hannah Michalska; Alain Berthoz; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Simple spike dynamics of Purkinje cells in the macaque vestibulo-cerebellum during passive whole-body self-motion.

Authors:  Jean Laurens; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Commutative Properties of Head Direction Cells during Locomotion in 3D: Are All Routes Equal?

Authors:  Patrick A LaChance; Julie R Dumont; Pelin Ozel; Jennifer L Marcroft; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cerebellar Prediction of the Dynamic Sensory Consequences of Gravity.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Neural representation of orientation relative to gravity in the macaque cerebellum.

Authors:  Jean Laurens; Hui Meng; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  The Brain Compass: A Perspective on How Self-Motion Updates the Head Direction Cell Attractor.

Authors:  Jean Laurens; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Computation of linear acceleration through an internal model in the macaque cerebellum.

Authors:  Jean Laurens; Hui Meng; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Time Course of Sensory Substitution for Gravity Sensing in Visual Vertical Orientation Perception following Complete Vestibular Loss.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Jean Laurens
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-07-13

9.  Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity.

Authors:  Mohsen Jamali; Jerome Carriot; Maurice J Chacron; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  The otolith vermis: A systems neuroscience theory of the Nodulus and Uvula.

Authors:  Jean Laurens
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.