Literature DB >> 6300340

Correlated firing of cat retinal ganglion cells. I. Spontaneously active inputs to X- and Y-cells.

D N Mastronarde.   

Abstract

1. The shared inputs to cat retinal ganglion cells have been investigated by studying correlations in the maintained firing of neighboring ganglion cells. The firing of one cell was recorded from its axon in the optic tract, while that of a neighboring cell was simultaneously recorded with a second electrode in the retina. The recorded cells were of the X- or Y-type and viewed a uniform screen having a luminance of 10 cd/m2. 2. Ganglion cells with overlapping receptive-field centers showed two basic forms of correlated firing: if they had the same center sign (both on-center or both off-center), then they tended to fire at the same time, as shown by a peak in their cross-correlogram; but if they had opposite center signs (an on- and and off-center cell), they tended not to fire at the same time, as shown by a well, or dip, in their cross-correlogram. 3. Both of these tendencies were strongest for cells that were close together and did not appear for cells with nonoverlapping receptive-field centers. The strongest correlations were between neighboring Y-cells, cells with large fields, and the weakest were between X-cells, cells with small fields. In general, the strength of the correlations depended primarily on the area of the overlap between fields. 4. These correlations in maintained firing appear to be principally or entirely caused by shared inputs to the ganglion cells from more distal retinal neurons. The signals from these distal neurons appear to have strong, brief (4-8 ms), well-defined effects on ganglion cells, which are observed even in the absence of a visual stimulus. The inputs responsible for the correlated firing are thus referred to as spontaneously active inputs or simply as active inputs. 5. An analysis of the features in the various types of cross-correlograms supports the following statements about these spontaneously active inputs. a) There are two types of active inputs: inputs excitatory to on-center cells and simultaneously inhibitory to off-center center cells and inputs excitatory to off-center cells and simultaneously inhibitory to on-center cells. b) The active inputs of each type provide excitation to both X- and Y-cells of one center sign and inhibition to both X- and Y-cells of the other center sign. There is no evidence for a special class of more selective inputs providing input only to X-cells or only to Y-cells. c) Active inputs account for the majority (about 80%) of the spikes in the maintained activity of Y-cells but only a small fraction (about 15%) of the spikes in the maintained activity of X-cells. 6. A likely source of the active input signals appears to be spiking amacrine cells with a low rate of spontaneous activity.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6300340     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1983.49.2.303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  75 in total

1.  Modeling LGN responses during free-viewing: a possible role of microscopic eye movements in the refinement of cortical orientation selectivity.

Authors:  M Rucci; G M Edelman; J Wray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Increased spontaneous unit activity and appearance of spontaneous negative potentials in the goldfish tectum during refinement of the optic projection.

Authors:  B J Kolls; R L Meyer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Correlated firing in macaque visual area MT: time scales and relationship to behavior.

Authors:  W Bair; E Zohary; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Suppression of cortical NMDA receptor function prevents development of orientation selectivity in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  A S Ramoa; A F Mower; D Liao; S I Jafri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Decoding neuronal spike trains: how important are correlations?

Authors:  Sheila Nirenberg; Peter E Latham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Synergy, redundancy, and independence in population codes.

Authors:  Elad Schneidman; William Bialek; Michael J Berry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A cooperation and competition based simple cell receptive field model and study of feed-forward linear and nonlinear contributions to orientation selectivity.

Authors:  Basabi Bhaumik; Mona Mathur
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  A model of high-frequency oscillatory potentials in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Garrett T Kenyon; Bartlett Moore; Janelle Jeffs; Kate S Denning; Greg J Stephens; Bryan J Travis; John S George; James Theiler; David W Marshak
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Neural coding properties based on spike timing and pattern correlation of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Han-Yan Gong; Ying-Ying Zhang; Pei-Ji Liang; Pu-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Light increases the gap junctional coupling of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Edward H Hu; Feng Pan; Béla Völgyi; Stewart A Bloomfield
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.