Literature DB >> 6271939

Phagocytic recognition of bone by macrophages.

T J Chambers.   

Abstract

There is now persuasive evidence that osteoclasts are formed by the fusion of mononuclear phagocytes. The presence of osteoclasts on bone thus infers the phagocytic recognition bone by mononuclear phagocytes. I compared the phagocytic recognition by macrophages of hydroxyapatite, and native, demineralised and deproteinated bone powder. Removal of mineral resulted in loss of phagocytic recognition by macrophages, while removal of the organic component resulted in avid binding of bone fragments to a similar degree to that observed for hydroxyapatite crystals. The organic component of bone therefore protects the hydroxyapatite crystals of the mineral component from phagocytic recognition by macrophages. A simple model for bone resorption would be that resident bone-lining cells (active and resting osteoblasts) remove the organic protection under appropriate stimuli and thus allow phagocytic recognition of the underlying mineral by macrophages, which accumulate, fuse and commence digestion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6271939     DOI: 10.1002/path.1711350102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  10 in total

1.  Osteoclast formation is related to bone matrix age.

Authors:  B Groessner-Schreiber; M Krukowski; D Hertweck; P Osdoby
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  The role of macrophages and giant cells in loosening of joint replacement.

Authors:  U E Pazzaglia; J A Pringle
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1988

Review 3.  Invasive cervical resorption: a review.

Authors:  Shilpa D Kandalgaonkar; Leena A Gharat; Suyog D Tupsakhare; Mahesh H Gabhane
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-12-26

4.  Evidence for capping of Fc gamma receptors on osteoclasts.

Authors:  A M Pierce; S Lindskog
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Exercise and bone mineral density.

Authors:  P D Chilibeck; D G Sale; C E Webber
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  The cellular basis of bone remodeling: the quantum concept reexamined in light of recent advances in the cell biology of bone.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Motility and resorption: osteoclastic activity in vitro.

Authors:  N N Ali; A Boyde; S J Jones
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1984

8.  Failure of thymic grafts to stimulate resorption of bone in the Fatty/Orl-op rat.

Authors:  N W Nisbet; S F Waldron; M J Marshall
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Osteoclast precursor interaction with bone matrix induces osteoclast formation directly by an interleukin-1-mediated autocrine mechanism.

Authors:  Zhenqiang Yao; Lianping Xing; Chunlin Qin; Edward M Schwarz; Brendan F Boyce
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Trauma-Induced Nanohydroxyapatite Deposition in Skeletal Muscle is Sufficient to Drive Heterotopic Ossification.

Authors:  Stephanie N Moore-Lotridge; Qiaoli Li; Breanne H Y Gibson; Joseph T Martin; Gregory D Hawley; Thomas H Arnold; Masanori Saito; Sami Tannouri; Herbert S Schwartz; Richard J Gumina; Justin M M Cates; Jouni Uitto; Jonathan G Schoenecker
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.333

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.