Literature DB >> 2054718

Osteoclast formation is related to bone matrix age.

B Groessner-Schreiber1, M Krukowski, D Hertweck, P Osdoby.   

Abstract

Little is known about the relationship between the age of the skeleton and the development of multinucleated bone-resorbing cells, osteoclasts. It has been shown that mineralized bone implanted onto the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) is effective in the recruitment and differentiation of osteoclast precursors. In studies reported here we used the CAM system to examine the influence of bone matrix age on osteoclast formation. Devitalized mineralized bone particles (75-250 microns) were prepared from rats of various ages (2, 4, 9, 12, and 16 months). The particles were implanted onto the chick chorioallantoic membrane and 8 days later implants were harvested and processed for morphometric or immunohistochemical analysis. Osteoclast number, cell area, nucleocytoplasmic ratio, and the presence of a distinctive osteoclast antigen, defined by the 121F monoclonal antibody, were determined. Bone particles of each age group resulted in the formation of osteoclast-like giant cells. Compared with multinucleated cells that formed in response to bone particles obtained from 2-month-old rats, matrix from the oldest age group (16 months) elicited significantly fewer and smaller cells which contained a smaller number of nuclei. These data suggest that with aging, bone undergoes qualitative and/or quantitative changes that affect the recruitment and differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2054718     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  23 in total

1.  Sex- and age-related changes in bone and serum osteocalcin.

Authors:  D Vanderschueren; G Gevers; G Raymaekers; P Devos; J Dequeker
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Osteoclastic features of cells that resorb bone implants in rats.

Authors:  J Glowacki; K A Cox
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  The bone induction principle.

Authors:  M R Urist; B F Silverman; K Büring; F L Dubuc; J M Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1967 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Phagocytic recognition of bone by macrophages.

Authors:  T J Chambers
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Age and sex variations of bone matrix proteins in Wistar rats.

Authors:  J M Mbuyi-Muamba; J Dequeker
Journal:  Growth       Date:  1983

6.  Influence of maturation and aging on mechanical and biochemical parameters of rat bone.

Authors:  H G Vogel
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 5.140

7.  Changes with age in the non-collagenous proteins of human bone.

Authors:  I R Dickson; M K Bagga
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.417

8.  Influence of age on mechanical properties of healing fractures and intact bones in rats.

Authors:  A Ekeland; L B Engesoeter; N Langeland
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1982-08

9.  Fate of mineralized and demineralized osseous implants in cranial defects.

Authors:  J Glowacki; D Altobelli; J B Mulliken
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Identification of osteoclast-specific monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  M J Oursler; L V Bell; B Clevinger; P Osdoby
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  3 in total

1.  The relationship between the number of nuclei of an osteoclast and its resorptive capability in vitro.

Authors:  K Piper; A Boyde; S J Jones
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1992-09

2.  Osteoclasts prefer aged bone.

Authors:  K Henriksen; D J Leeming; I Byrjalsen; R H Nielsen; M G Sorensen; M H Dziegiel; T John Martin; C Christiansen; P Qvist; M A Karsdal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Use of an anionic collagen matrix made from bovine intestinal serosa for in vivo repair of cranial defects.

Authors:  Mariane Silva Pettian; Ana Maria de Guzzi Plepis; Virginia da Conceição Amaro Martins; Geovane Ribeiro Dos Santos; Clovis Antônio Lopes Pinto; Ewerton Alexandre Galdeano; Amanda Regina Alves Calegari; Carlos Alberto de Moraes; Marcelo Rodrigues da Cunha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.