Comparison of media and methods for counting Clostridium perfringens in poultry meat and further-processed products.

A Most Probable Number (MPN) method involving Differential Reinforced Clostridial Medium followed by streaking on Willis & Hobbs medium was compared with direct plating of samples on Tryptose-Sulphite-Cycloserine agar without egg yolk, and two forms of Oleandomycin-Polymyxin-Sulphadiazine-Perfringens agar, one being prepared from a commercial, dehydrated product. With skin samples taken from chicken carcasses at different stages of processing, the three direct plating media gave similar counts of Cl. perfringens whereas results obtained with the MPN method were consistently lower. Although counts of Cl. perfringens from various further processed products were usually less than 10/g, the three plating media showed similar specificity for this organism. All media supported good growth of reference strains of Clostridium perfringens but it was found that physiologically similar species, including Cl. absonum, Cl. paraperfringens and Cl. perenne also grew uninhibited in these media and produced colonies identical with those of Cl. perfringens, thus indicating the need for confirmatory tests for Cl. perfringens when examining natural samples.