Literature DB >> 195698

ICMSF methods studies. VIII. Comparative study for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens in foods.

A H Hauschild, R J Gilbert, S M Harmon, M F O'Keeffe, R Vahlefeld.   

Abstract

Four methods were compared in an international comparative study for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens: the SFP (Shahidi-Ferguson perfringens) agar (A), TSC (tryptose-sulfite-cycloserin) agar (B), SC (sulfite-cycloserine) agar (C), and neomycin blood agar (D) methods. The confirmed C. perfringens counts were slightly lower for D than for A-C. The percentages of presumptive colonies confirmed as C. perfringens were essentially the same in each method. The relative numbers of nonspecific colonies were the lowest in C, followed by B, D, and A. The methods were also compared for simplicity and for aspects associated with the recognition and selection of presumptive colonies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 195698     DOI: 10.1139/m77-130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Microbiol        ISSN: 0008-4166            Impact factor:   2.419


  3 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of multiply antibiotic-resistant Clostridum perfringens strains from porcine feces.

Authors:  J I Rood; E A Maher; E B Somers; E Campos; C L Duncan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  New presumptive identification test for Clostridium perfringens: reverse CAMP test.

Authors:  M V Hansen; L P Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of media and methods for counting Clostridium perfringens in poultry meat and further-processed products.

Authors:  B W Adams; G C Mead
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1980-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.