Literature DB >> 6239897

Which prescriptive screening programmes are worth while?

J M Chamberlain.   

Abstract

Prescriptive screening is defined as screening for diseases solely for the benefit of the individuals participating in the programme. Currently used screening programmes are examined at each stage of life-antenatal, postnatal, school age, adult life, and old age. It is concluded that most disorders for which screening can be confidently recommended for the benefit of the individual are those occurring in children: screening infants for phenylketonuria, hypothyroidism, visual and auditory impairment, and probably congenital dislocation of the hip. Subject to parents' informed consent to participate, antenatal screening for Down's syndrome and neural tube defects is effective in high risk populations. Screening programmes to detect in school children visual and auditory defects and dental diseases are worth while. Two major problems arise in most programmes--firstly, how to achieve a high compliance rate of the population in attending for screening and accepting subsequent treatment; secondly, how to determine what treatment, if any, should be offered to borderline cases. Further evaluation of these problems is required for many programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6239897      PMCID: PMC1052368          DOI: 10.1136/jech.38.4.270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  17 in total

1.  A clicking hip in a newborn baby should never be ignored.

Authors:  K T Cunningham; A Moulton; S A Beningfield; C R Maddock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Human benefits and costs of a national screening programme for neural-tube defects.

Authors:  J Chamberlain
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Sounding board. Risks of correcting the risks of coronary disease and stroke with drugs.

Authors:  M F Oliver
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-02-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  How successful is screening for congenital disease of the hip?

Authors:  D M Parkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Screening for spina bifida cystica. A cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  S Hagard; F Carter; R G Milne
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1976-03

7.  Assessment of a programme to screen the newborn for congenital hypothyroidism.

Authors:  P Smith; A Morris
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1979-02

8.  [Epidemiologic evaluation of health program in perinatology. I. Region rhône-Alpes 1972-1975 (author's transl)].

Authors:  C Rumeau-Rouquette; M Crost-Deniel; G Bréart; C du Mazaubrun
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  1977-06-30       Impact factor: 1.019

Review 9.  Prescriptive screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J M Leaver; A Alvik; M D Warren
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Evaluation of early diagnostic services for the elderly.

Authors:  C P Lowther; R D MacLeod; J Williamson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-08-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Community development in the new NHS.

Authors:  B Fisher; S Gillam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Screening for genital chlamydial infection: the agenda for general practice.

Authors:  T Stokes; M Santer; J Mears
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Screening for presymptomatic disease.

Authors:  F V Flynn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Fatigue as prognostic risk marker of mental sickness absence in white collar employees.

Authors:  C A M Roelen; M W Heymans; W van Rhenen; J W Groothoff; J W R Twisk; U Bültmann
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

5.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  M Pierce; S Lundy; A Palanisamy; S Winning; J King
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.