Literature DB >> 7316003

How successful is screening for congenital disease of the hip?

D M Parkin.   

Abstract

The efficacy of neonatal screening for congenital disease of the hip is reviewed in relation to currently accepted criteria. There is poor validity of the tests used, imperfect understanding of the natural history of the condition, and absence of information on the outcome of treatment following screening compared to that following conventional diagnosis. The benefits of screening, although probably real, are therefore difficult to quantify. Strategies for increasing the efficiency of screening (maximizing the benefit:cost ratio) by mass screening after the neonatal period or by instituting routine retesting of all infants are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7316003      PMCID: PMC1619974          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.71.12.1378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  34 in total

1.  Diagnosis of congenital dysplasia of the hip in the newborn infant.

Authors:  S S COLEMAN
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1956-10-06

2.  The incidence of congenital malformations: a study of 5,964 pregnancies.

Authors:  R McINTOSH; K K MERRITT; M R RICHARDS; M H SAMUELS; M T BELLOWS
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1954-11       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Late results of treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  G M MULLER; H J SEDDON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1953-08

4.  Congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  P M Dunn
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-07-02

5.  Congenital dislocation of the hip--diagnostic screening and treatment. A comparative study of two populations of infants and children.

Authors:  M Kadkhoda; S M Chung; F O Adebonojo
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  Avascular necrosis of the capital femoral epiphysis as a complication of closed reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip. A critical review of twenty years' experience at Gillette Children's Hospital.

Authors:  J R Gage; R B Winter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Result of treatment from birth of unstable hips. A clinical and radiographic 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  C Hirsch; S Scheller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1969 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effectiveness of neonatal screening for congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  M J Place; D M Parkin; J M Fritton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Problems in the early recognition of congenital hip dislocation.

Authors:  G Walker
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-07-17

10.  Congenital dislocation of the hip. The relationship of premanipulation traction and age to avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  D S Weiner; W A Hoyt; H W O'dell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

1.  Late presentation of congenital dislocation of the hip: an audit.

Authors:  S J Gillam; M Foss; M Woolaway
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  A national survey of screening for congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  C Dezateux; S Godward
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Screening for congenital dislocation of the hip: an economic appraisal.

Authors:  M J Fulton; M L Barer
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  To screen or not to screen: congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  W K Frankenburg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Congenital dislocation of the hip: early and late diagnosis and management compared.

Authors:  P M Dunn; R E Evans; M J Thearle; H E Griffiths; P J Witherow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Which prescriptive screening programmes are worth while?

Authors:  J M Chamberlain
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.710

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.