Literature DB >> 6239007

Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning.

C C Presson, M D Hazelrigg.   

Abstract

The current study examined the conditions under which cognitive representations of spatial information are stored in orientation-specific ways (like pictures) versus orientation-free ways. College students learned simple paths by viewing a map of them (map condition), by walking them while blindfolded (walk condition), or by directly viewing the route from a single vantage point (look condition). Blindfolded subjects then stood on the route in various orientations and made directional judgments to other locations on the route. When subjects learned the route by indirect, symbolic means (map), judgments were quite easy when aligned with the learned map orientation and were difficult if the judgment was not aligned with the learned map orientation. However, when subjects learned the route by more direct, primary spatial learning (walk or look), there were no alignment effects. Thus, subjects treat information from primary (direct) and secondary (symbolic) spatial learning in distinct ways. Learning from a map results in a figural representation that has great precision but a specific orientation. Learning the route more directly results in a representation that is less precise but one that can be used in more flexible ways.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6239007     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  20 in total

1.  The representation and integration in memory of spatial and nonspatial information.

Authors:  T P McNamara; J A Halpin; J K Hardy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

2.  The accuracy of spatial information from temporally and spatially organized mental maps.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Curiel; Gabriel A Radvansky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

3.  Viewpoint alignment and response conflict during spatial judgment.

Authors:  Myeong-Ho Sohn; Richard A Carlson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

Review 4.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

5.  Route and survey processing of topographical memory during navigation.

Authors:  Luca Latini-Corazzini; Marie Pascale Nesa; Mathieu Ceccaldi; Eric Guedj; Catherine Thinus-Blanc; Franco Cauda; Federico D'Agata; Federico Dagata; Patrick Péruch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-20

6.  How different spatial representations interact in virtual environments: the role of mental frame syncing.

Authors:  Silvia Serino; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-02-07

7.  Mental imagery skills predict the ability in performing environmental directional judgements.

Authors:  Laura Piccardi; Alessia Bocchi; Massimiliano Palmiero; Paola Verde; Raffaella Nori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Map learning and the alignment effect in young and older adults: how do they gain from having a map available while performing pointing tasks?

Authors:  Erika Borella; Chiara Meneghetti; Veronica Muffato; Rossana De Beni
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-09

9.  Orientation-specificity in kinesthetic spatial learning: the role of multiple orientations.

Authors:  C C Presson; N DeLange; M D Hazelrigg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

10.  Active navigation and orientation-free spatial representations.

Authors:  Hong-Jin Sun; George S W Chan; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.