Literature DB >> 6223978

Distribution of visual attention over space.

P Podgorny, R N Shepard.   

Abstract

Subjects viewed 3 X 3 grids in which different subsets of the nine squares were designated as "figure," either by physical shading of those squares or by a verbal instruction to imagine those squares as shaded. The time taken by participants to respond "on" or "off" the figure was measured for single or multiple probe dots, which all appeared on or off the figural subset together, and which had already been shown to be equally detectable against shaded or unshaded squares and in all nine locations within the grid. In contrast to the set-size effect generally found in experiments on memory scanning, reaction time did not necessarily increase with the number of squares in the figural subset. Instead, the critical variable, which in previous research may often have adventitiously covaried with set size, was the spatial compactness of the subsets (as indexed by square-root-area over perimeter): Probes of less compact figures required more time to classify correctly. Subjects were evidently more successful in confining their attention to sets of mutually proximal items. Reasons are given for believing that this principle may also apply in the more abstract representational or semantic spaces that determine reaction times and errors in various other cognitive tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6223978     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.9.3.380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

1.  The role of meaning and familiarity in mental transformations.

Authors:  W Smith; I E Dror
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with discrete spatial cues.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pellizzer; James H Hedges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with continuous spatial cues.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pellizzer; James H Hedges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

5.  Attentive fields are related to focal and contextual features: a study of Müller-Lyer distortions.

Authors:  A W Pressey; C A Pressey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

6.  Vision outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  J Braun; D Sagi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

7.  Spatial distribution of visual attention: perceptual sensitivity and response latency.

Authors:  T C Handy; A Kingstone; G R Mangun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

8.  Visual selection mediated by location: selecting successive visual objects.

Authors:  K R Cave; H Pashler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

9.  When redundancy hurts letter detection: an attempt to define one condition.

Authors:  N F Johnson; A J Blum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

10.  On analog movements of visual attention.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.