Literature DB >> 1594432

Attentive fields are related to focal and contextual features: a study of Müller-Lyer distortions.

A W Pressey1, C A Pressey.   

Abstract

The mathematical model associated with integrative field theory was used to infer the size of attentive fields in a task involving judgments of size. A compounded Müller-Lyer task was employed in which fins between or outside the standard shafts were systematically removed. Performance on this task was simulated by a computer that generated families of theoretical functions varying in the parameter of attentive field size. Individual theoretical functions were then correlated with an empirical function obtained from real observers. The value of attentive field size that provided the best fit between functions was then selected. The results showed that, in almost all cases, the optimum size of the attentive field was smaller for the shrinkage form than for the expansion form of the Müller-Lyer pattern, that the attentive field changed more dramatically with changes in stimulus variables in the expansion form than in the shrinkage form, and that changes in viewing distance had little effect on the optimum size of the attentive field. It was concluded that the attention was involved both in figure-ground segregation and in maintaining object constancy. The similarity of these results to data obtained in recognition and detection tasks was noted.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1594432     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  31 in total

1.  The effects of varying fins in Müller-Lyer and Holding illusions.

Authors:  A Pressey; N S Martin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

2.  Effects of gap size between shaft and fins and of angle of fins on the Müller--Lyer illusion.

Authors:  A W Pressey; V Di Lollo; R W Tait
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  A comment on "The effects of framing ratio and oblique length on Ponzo illusion magnitude".

Authors:  A W Pressey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

4.  Effect of intershaft wing removal on the Mueller-Lyer illusion as a function of judgment task.

Authors:  J D Larsen; N K Garn; T Fritsch
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1989-06

5.  The interaction between stimulus variations and age trends in the Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  J S Girgus; S Coren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-01

6.  A theory of the Mueller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  A W Pressey
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1967-10

7.  Evidence for the role of attentive fields in masking.

Authors:  A W Pressey; A E Wilson; D W Harper
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Control stimuli in investigations of the acute-angled and obtuse-angled Müller-Lyer illusions.

Authors:  J Adam; L Bateman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Effects of distance between standard and comparison lines on the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  A W Pressey; V Di Lollo
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Spatial attention in Ponzo-like patterns.

Authors:  A W Pressey; D Epp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

2.  Another look at attentive fields: comments on Pollack and Jaeger.

Authors:  A W Pressey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-04

3.  A quantitative analysis of illusion magnitude predicted by several averaging theories of the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  P R DeLucia
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.