Literature DB >> 6219622

In vitro antibacterial activity of norfloxacin (MK-0366, AM-715) and other agents against gastrointestinal tract pathogens.

D L Shungu, E Weinberg, H H Gadebusch.   

Abstract

A comparison was made of the in vitro activities of norfloxacin and of nine other orally administered antibacterial agents against 180 clinical isolates representing the bacterial species most frequently implicated in infections of the gastrointestinal tract in humans. The 90% minimal inhibitory concentrations showed norfloxacin to be 4, 15, 4, 17, 17, 17, and 33 times more active than the next best compound tested against Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Yersinia enterocolitica, respectively, with an overall 90% minimal inhibitory concentration of less than or equal to 0.5 micrograms/ml. Norfloxacin was least active against Clostridium difficile (90% minimal inhibitory concentration, 128 micrograms/ml). These results should encourage further evaluation of norfloxacin as a potential chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of enteric bacterial infections for which antibiotic therapy is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6219622      PMCID: PMC184622          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.23.1.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  27 in total

1.  Antimicrobial resistance of Shigellae isolated in Michigan.

Authors:  R C Gordon; T R Thompson; W Carlson; J W Dyke; L I Stevens
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Antibiotic resistance in intestinal bacteria.

Authors:  W E Farrar
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1979-09

Review 3.  Antimicrobial agents in diarrhoeal disease.

Authors:  H P Lambert
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1979-09

4.  Apparent absence of transferable resistance to nalidixic acid in pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  L G Burman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Comparative efficacy of nalidixic acid and ampicillin for severe shigellosis.

Authors:  K C Haltalin; J D Nelson; H T Kusmiesz
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Clinical approach to infectious diarrheas.

Authors:  H L DuPont; R B Hornick
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Emergence of resistant organisms as a function of dose in oxolinic acid therapy.

Authors:  H Clark; N K Brown; J F Wallace; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.378

8.  Collaborative evaluation of a proposed reference dilution method of susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  V L Sutter; A L Barry; T D Wilkins; R J Zabransky
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities of shigellae isolated in Houston, Texas, in 1974.

Authors:  P A Byers; H L Dupont; M C Goldschmidt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Oxolinic acid for the treatment of chronic gastrointestinal Shigella carriers.

Authors:  B S Ribner; E H Freimer
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.345

View more
  20 in total

1.  Sequence analysis of the gyrA and parC homologues of a wild-type strain of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and its fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants.

Authors:  J Okuda; E Hayakawa; M Nishibuchi; T Nishino
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of norfloxacin for cholera.

Authors:  S K Bhattacharya; M K Bhattacharya; P Dutta; D Dutta; S P De; S N Sikdar; A Maitra; A Dutta; S C Pal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Recovery of norfloxacin in feces after administration of a single oral dose to human volunteers.

Authors:  R D Cofsky; L duBouchet; S H Landesman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Multicenter evaluation of the proposed quality control limits and interpretive zone standards for in vitro susceptibility testing with norfloxacin.

Authors:  D L Shungu; V Tutlane; H H Gadebusch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of norfloxacin and nalidixic acid for treatment of dysentery caused by Shigella dysenteriae type 1 in adults.

Authors:  F Rogerie; D Ott; J Vandepitte; L Verbist; P Lemmens; I Habiyaremye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, a new carboxyquinoline antimicrobial agent.

Authors:  G M Eliopoulos; A Gardella; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Norfloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  B Holmes; R N Brogden; D M Richards
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  The comparative activity of pefloxacin, enoxacin, ciprofloxacin and 13 other antimicrobial agents against enteropathogenic microorganisms.

Authors:  R Vanhoof; J M Hubrechts; E Roebben; H J Nyssen; E Nulens; J Leger; N De Schepper
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Comparison of the in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867) and norfloxacin against gastrointestinal tract pathogens.

Authors:  M Diez-Enciso; G Mas-Jimenez; A Velasco-Cerrudo; A Gutierrez-Altes
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Three-year prospective study of intestinal pathogens in Madrid, Spain.

Authors:  A C Velasco; M L Mateos; G Más; A Pedraza; M Díez; A Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.