Literature DB >> 6184333

Chromosome banding: specification of structural features of dyes giving rise to G-banding.

D Curtis, R W Horobin.   

Abstract

Metaphase chromosomes were stained in a routine G-banding procedure with 39 basic dyes of varied structures substituted for the Giemsa stain. Staining outcomes were categorized as: overstained, differentially stained, trivially or unstained. Certain structural features of the dyes were described numerically, namely, largest conjugated fragment (LCF), conjugated bond number (CBN) and cationic weight. The staining outcomes were compared to these numerical structural parameters, and structure--staining correlations sought. Dyes with large conjugated systems (and high LCF values) were seen to be overstained; dyes with low LCF values were often non-staining. At intermediate LCF values, the more hydrophobic dyes (with high Hansch pi values) stained differentially; the more hydrophilic dyes failed to stain. Expressed numerically, 89% of the dyes with the following characteristics stained differentially: 30 greater than or equal to LCF greater than or equal to 10; Hansch pi greater than -5.0. It was concluded that contributions to dye-chromosome affinity included coulombic forces and van der Waals attractions and that the selectivity of G-banding was largely due to hydrophobic bonding. Induction of bands could be due to the loss of hydrophilic histones, amplifying underlying variations in the hydrophobic-hydrophilic character of the chromosome structure. Relatively hydrophobic sites include AT-rich DNA and disulphide-rich proteins. The effects on Romanowsky G-banding of chemically modifying chromosomes were in keeping with this model. Overstaining resulted from formation of either hydrophobic or conjugated derivatives or both, whereas trivial or non-staining arose from the formation of hydrophilic derivatives. Intriguingly, the efficacy of the dyes used for Q-banding also correlated positively with their hydrophobic character.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6184333     DOI: 10.1007/bf01005233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochem J        ISSN: 0018-2214


  32 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome banding.

Authors:  D E Comings
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  New technique for distinguishing between human chromosomes.

Authors:  A T Sumner; H J Evans; R A Buckland
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1971-07-07

3.  Chemical differentiation with fluorescent alkylating agents in Vicia faba metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  T Caspersson; L Zech; E J Modest; G E Foley; U Wagh; E Simonsson
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  DNA-binding fluorochromes for the study of the organization of the metaphase nucleus.

Authors:  T Caspersson; L Zech; E J Modest; G E Foley; U Wagh; E Simonsson
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Dye binding mechanisms in G-banding of chromosomes.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Suppression of quinacrine banding of human chromosomes by mounting in organic media.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-12-06       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Scanning electron microscopy of the G-banded human karyotype.

Authors:  C J Harrison; M Britch; T D Allen; R Harris
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Effects of acetic acid-alcohol, trypsin, histone 1 and histone fragments on Giemsa staining patterns in chromosomes.

Authors:  R I Barnett; V A Gray; E A MacKinnon
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1980

9.  Cytochemical study of pseudoisocyanine stained human chromosomes.

Authors:  A M Vagner-Capodano; M H Pinna-Delgrossi; A Stahl
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1976-01-28       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Structure-staining relationships in histochemistry and biological staining. I. Theoretical background and a general account of correlation of histochemical staining with the chemical structure of the reagents used.

Authors:  R W Horobin
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 1.758

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fluorescent cationic probes for nuclei of living cells: why are they selective? A quantitative structure-activity relations analysis.

Authors:  Richard W Horobin; Juan C Stockert; Fiza Rashid-Doubell
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  One-bath trichrome staining: investigation of a general mechanism based on a structure-staining correlation analysis.

Authors:  R W Horobin; L Flemming
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1988-01

3.  Prediction of in situ fluorescence of histochemical reagents using a structure-staining correlation procedure.

Authors:  A Juarranz; R W Horobin; G B Proctor
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1986

4.  The involvement of nucleosomes in Giemsa staining of chromosomes. A new hypothesis on the banding mechanism.

Authors:  P van Duijn; A C van Prooijen-Knegt; M van der Ploeg
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1985
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.