Literature DB >> 7372504

Effects of acetic acid-alcohol, trypsin, histone 1 and histone fragments on Giemsa staining patterns in chromosomes.

R I Barnett, V A Gray, E A MacKinnon.   

Abstract

In an effort to minimize subjective bias, a classification scheme was devised to assess Giemsa staining patterns obtained with experiments involving acetic acid-alcohol and exogenously applied histone 1 and polypeptides. A single rinse of metaphase preparations with acetic acid-alcohol quantitatively reduced Giemsa dye binding. Acid-alcohol irreversibly changed the conformation of H1 and its ability to interfere with trypsin G-banding. Our results suggest that, in addition to protein extraction, acid-alcohol may alter the conformation of acid-insoluble components of metaphase chromosomes. The carboxy-terminal polypeptide (residues 73--212) from NBS cleavage of H1 was an effective inhibitor of Giemsa staining and trypsin G-banding. However, this polypeptide which is preferential for supercoiled DNA was much less efficient in inhibiting Giemsa staining of trypsinized metaphase chromosomes. The molecular consequences of these experiments are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7372504     DOI: 10.1007/bf00493170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochemistry        ISSN: 0301-5564


  33 in total

1.  Studies on the interaction of H1 histone with superhelical DNA: characterization of the recognition and binding regions of H1 histones.

Authors:  D S Singer; M F Singer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Nucleosome conformation: pH and organic solvent effects.

Authors:  M Zama; D E Olins; B Prescott; G J Thomas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Conformation of deoxyribonucleic acid in alcohol solutions.

Authors:  J C Girod; W C Johnson; S K Huntington; M F Maestre
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1973-12-04       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Mechanisms of chromosome banding. II. Evidence that histones are not involved.

Authors:  D E Comings; E Avelino
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Histones in fixed cytological preparations of Chinese hamster chromosomes demonstrated by immunofluorescence.

Authors:  L Pothier; J F Gallagher; C E Wright; P R Libby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Dehydrated circular DNA: circular dichroism of molecules in ethanolic solutions.

Authors:  D M Gray; T N Taylor; D Lang
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  DNA-protein interactions and chromosome banding.

Authors:  G D Burkholder; M G Weaver
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  The role of trypsin in the pre-treatment of chromosomes for Giemsa banding.

Authors:  B R Korf; B E Schuh; M J Salwen; D Warburton; O J Miller
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1976-01-28       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Mechanisms of chromosome banding. VII. Interaction of methylene blue with DNA and chromatin.

Authors:  D E Comings; E Avelino
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975-08-11       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Changes in elemental composition of human chromosomes during a G-banding (ASG) and a C-banding (BSG) procedure.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1978-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  The involvement of nucleosomes in Giemsa staining of chromosomes. A new hypothesis on the banding mechanism.

Authors:  P van Duijn; A C van Prooijen-Knegt; M van der Ploeg
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1985

2.  Chromosome banding: specification of structural features of dyes giving rise to G-banding.

Authors:  D Curtis; R W Horobin
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1982-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.