Literature DB >> 6181884

A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis.

C DeLisi, F Marchetti, G Del Grosso.   

Abstract

In order that cells respond to environmental cues, they must be able to measure ambient ligand concentration. Concentrations fluctuate, however, because of thermal noise, and one can readily show that estimates based on concentration values at a particular moment will be subject to substantial error. Cells are therefore expected to average their estimates over some limited time period. In this paper we assume that a cell uses fractional receptor occupancy as a measure of ambient ligand concentration and develop general expressions for the error a cell makes because the length of the averaging period is necessarily limited. Our analysis is general, relieving many of the assumptions underlying the seminal work of Berg and Purcell. The most important formal difference is our inclusion of occupancy-dependent dissociation--a phenomenon that has been well-documented for many systems. In addition, our formulation permits signal averaging to begin before chemical equilibrium has been established and it allows binding kinetics to be nonlinear (i.e., biomolecular rather than pseudo-first-order). The results are applied to spatial and temporal concentration gradients. In particular we estimate the minimum averaging times required for cells to detect such gradients under typical in vitro conditions. These estimates involve assigning numerical values to receptor ligand rate constants. If the rate constants are at their maximum possible values (limited only by center of mass diffusion), then either temporal or spatial gradients can be detected in minutes or less. If, however, as suggested by experiments, the rate constants are several orders of magnitude below their diffusion-limited values, then under typical constant gradient conditions the time required to detect a spatial gradient is prohibitively long, whereas temporal gradients can still be detected in reasonable lengths of time. This result was obtained for large cells such as lymphocytes, as well as for the smaller, bacterial cells. The ratio of averaging times for the two mechanisms--amounting to several orders of magnitude--is well beyond what could be reconciled by limitations of the calculation, and strongly suggests heavy reliance on temporal sensing mechanisms under typical in vitro conditions with constant spatial gradients.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6181884     DOI: 10.1007/bf02918313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biophys        ISSN: 0163-4992


  8 in total

1.  Physics of chemoreception.

Authors:  H C Berg; E M Purcell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Influence of external concentration fluctuations on leukocyte chemotactic orientation.

Authors:  D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1982 Jun-Sep

3.  Effect of nonspecific forces and finite receptor number on rate constants of ligand--cell bound-receptor interactions.

Authors:  C DeLisi; F W Wiegel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Optimal strategies in immunology III. The IgM-IgG switch.

Authors:  A S Perelson; B Goldstein; S Rocklin
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  The magnitude of signal amplification by ligand-induced receptor clustering.

Authors:  C DeLisi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Studies of bacterial chemotaxis in defined concentration gradients. A model for chemotaxis toward L-serine.

Authors:  F W Dahlquist; R A Elwell; P S Lovely
Journal:  J Supramol Struct       Date:  1976

7.  Chemotactic reorientation of granulocytes stimulated with micropipettes containing fMet-Leu-Phe.

Authors:  G Gerisch; H U Keller
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Sensory adaptation of leukocytes to chemotactic peptides.

Authors:  S H Zigmond; S J Sullivan
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 10.539

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Consequences of chemosensory phenomena for leukocyte chemotactic orientation.

Authors:  R T Tranquillo; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1986-02

2.  Spatial sensing of stimulus gradients can be superior to temporal sensing for free-swimming bacteria.

Authors:  D B Dusenbery
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis. II. The effects of non-equilibrated ligand binding.

Authors:  C DeLisi; F Marchetti
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1983-12

4.  Influence of external concentration fluctuations on leukocyte chemotactic orientation.

Authors:  D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1982 Jun-Sep

5.  Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance.

Authors:  Shannon F Stewman; Matthew Jones-Rhoades; Prabhakar Bhimalapuram; Martin Tchernookov; Daphne Preuss; Aaron R Dinner
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  Optimal noise filtering in the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Burton W Andrews; Tau-Mu Yi; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  A stochastic model for leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis based on receptor binding fluctuations.

Authors:  R T Tranquillo; D A Lauffenburger; S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  The limits of chemosensation vary across dimensions.

Authors:  Brendan A Bicknell; Peter Dayan; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Control of neurite growth and guidance by an inhibitory cell-body signal.

Authors:  Brendan A Bicknell; Zac Pujic; Peter Dayan; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.