Literature DB >> 2421906

Consequences of chemosensory phenomena for leukocyte chemotactic orientation.

R T Tranquillo, D A Lauffenburger.   

Abstract

The stochastic nature of cell surface receptor-ligand binding is known to limit the accuracy of detection of chemoattractant gradients by leukocytes, thus limiting the orientation ability that is crucial to the chemotactic response in host defense. The probabilistic cell orientation model of Lauffenburger is extended here to assess the consequences of recently discovered receptor phenomena: "down-regulation" of total surface receptor number, spatial asymmetry of surface receptors, and existence of a higher-affinity receptor subpopulation. In general, a reduction in orientation accuracy is predicted by inclusion of these phenomena. An orientation signal based on a simple model of chemosensory adaptation (i.e., a spatial difference in relative receptor occupancy) is found to be functionally different from the signal suggested by an experimental correlation (i.e., a spatial difference in absolute receptor occupancy). However, in the context of receptor "signal noise," the signal based on adaptation yields predictions in better qualitative agreement with the experimental orientation data of Zigmond. From this cell orientation model we can estimate the effective time-averaging period required for noise diminution to a level allowing orientation predictions to match observed levels. This time-averaging period presumably reflects the time constant for receptor signal transduction and locomotory response.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2421906     DOI: 10.1007/bf02788459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biophys        ISSN: 0163-4992


  23 in total

1.  The neutrophil N-formyl peptide receptor: dynamics of ligand-receptor interactions and their relationship to cellular responses.

Authors:  L A Sklar; A J Jesaitis; R G Painter
Journal:  Contemp Top Immunobiol       Date:  1984

2.  A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis.

Authors:  C DeLisi; F Marchetti; G Del Grosso
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1982 Jun-Sep

3.  Influence of external concentration fluctuations on leukocyte chemotactic orientation.

Authors:  D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1982 Jun-Sep

Review 4.  Chemoattractant receptor affinity reflects its ability to transduce different biological responses.

Authors:  R Snyderman
Journal:  Agents Actions Suppl       Date:  1983

5.  Signal transduction and ligand-receptor dynamics in the neutrophil. Ca2+ modulation and restoration.

Authors:  L A Sklar; Z G Oades
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Mechanics of cytogels I: oscillations in physarum.

Authors:  G F Oster; G M Odell
Journal:  Cell Motil       Date:  1984

7.  Guanine nucleotides modulate the binding affinity of the oligopeptide chemoattractant receptor on human polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

Authors:  C Koo; R J Lefkowitz; R Snyderman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Chemotactic reorientation of granulocytes stimulated with micropipettes containing fMet-Leu-Phe.

Authors:  G Gerisch; H U Keller
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Consequences of chemotactic peptide receptor modulation for leukocyte orientation.

Authors:  S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Asymmetric distribution of the chemotactic peptide receptor on polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

Authors:  S J Sullivan; G Daukas; S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  4 in total

1.  A dual-docking microfluidic cell migration assay (D2-Chip) for testing neutrophil chemotaxis and the memory effect.

Authors:  Ke Yang; Jiandong Wu; Guoqing Xu; Dongxue Xie; Hagit Peretz-Soroka; Susy Santos; Murray Alexander; Ling Zhu; Michael Zhang; Yong Liu; Francis Lin
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Stochastic model of leukocyte chemosensory movement.

Authors:  R T Tranquillo; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  A stochastic model for adhesion-mediated cell random motility and haptotaxis.

Authors:  R B Dickinson; R T Tranquillo
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  A stochastic model for leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis based on receptor binding fluctuations.

Authors:  R T Tranquillo; D A Lauffenburger; S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 10.539

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.