Literature DB >> 6181883

Influence of external concentration fluctuations on leukocyte chemotactic orientation.

D A Lauffenburger.   

Abstract

The quantitative dependence of leukocyte chemotactic orientation on imprecision in the measurement of chemoattractant concentrations from thermal fluctuations is analyzed. First, a mathematical model relating orientation to differences in receptor occupancy across cell dimensions is developed. This is then coupled with an extension of Berg and Purcell's analysis (1) of the precision of attractant concentration measurements by means of receptor occupancy. Our results show that thermal fluctuations in external concentrations can limit the accuracy of orientation, unless the measurement noise is reduced by averaging the measurements over a period of time. Comparison of our model predictions to experimental orientation data suggests that leukocytes do overcome this limitation, and allows estimation of the time-averaging period necessary to do so. For the orientation observed in a visual bridge assay by Zigmond (2) using the attractant peptide FNLLP, we estimate that receptor occupancy measurements for spatial comparison across cell dimensions must be averaged for a few minutes. Otherwise, the fluctuations in the attractant concentration near the cell will be too great to allow the observed degree of orientation. Our analysis also suggests that the ratio of signal-to-signal noise does not adequately characterize orientation accuracy. Accurate orientation can, in some situations, occur when this ratio is substantially less than unity; in other situations, a ratio much greater than unity is required for accurate orientation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6181883     DOI: 10.1007/bf02918312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biophys        ISSN: 0163-4992


  10 in total

1.  Physics of chemoreception.

Authors:  H C Berg; E M Purcell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  R M Macnab; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis.

Authors:  C DeLisi; F Marchetti; G Del Grosso
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1982 Jun-Sep

Review 4.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms of leukocyte chemotaxis.

Authors:  R Snyderman; E J Goetzl
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  The biophysics of ligand-receptor interactions.

Authors:  C DeLisi
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.318

6.  Effect of nonspecific forces and finite receptor number on rate constants of ligand--cell bound-receptor interactions.

Authors:  C DeLisi; F W Wiegel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Chemotactic factor concentration gradients in chemotaxis assay systems.

Authors:  D A Lauffenburger; S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors.

Authors:  S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Consequences of chemotactic peptide receptor modulation for leukocyte orientation.

Authors:  S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Chemotactic peptide receptor modulation in polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

Authors:  S J Sullivan; S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 10.539

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Consequences of chemosensory phenomena for leukocyte chemotactic orientation.

Authors:  R T Tranquillo; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1986-02

2.  Stochastic model of leukocyte chemosensory movement.

Authors:  R T Tranquillo; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Stochastic model of chemoattractant receptor dynamics in leukocyte chemosensory movement.

Authors:  P V Moghe; R T Tranquillo
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis. II. The effects of non-equilibrated ligand binding.

Authors:  C DeLisi; F Marchetti
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1983-12

5.  A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis.

Authors:  C DeLisi; F Marchetti; G Del Grosso
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1982 Jun-Sep

6.  Chemotaxis Model for Breast Cancer Cells Based on Signal/Noise Ratio.

Authors:  Seongjin Lim; Hyeono Nam; Jessie S Jeon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Modeling cell gradient sensing and migration in competing chemoattractant fields.

Authors:  Dan Wu; Francis Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Combinatorial guidance by CCR7 ligands for T lymphocytes migration in co-existing chemokine fields.

Authors:  Saravanan Nandagopal; Dan Wu; Francis Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sphingomonas wittichii Strain RW1 Genome-Wide Gene Expression Shifts in Response to Dioxins and Clay.

Authors:  Benli Chai; Tamara V Tsoi; Shoko Iwai; Cun Liu; Jordan A Fish; Cheng Gu; Timothy A Johnson; Gerben Zylstra; Brian J Teppen; Hui Li; Syed A Hashsham; Stephen A Boyd; James R Cole; James M Tiedje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.