Literature DB >> 6172999

Histamine release during morphine and fentanyl anesthesia.

C E Rosow, J Moss, D M Philbin, J J Savarese.   

Abstract

High doses of morphine produced peripheral vasodilation and frequently significant hypotension. These effects are thought to be due, in part, to the release of histamine. One putative advantage of high-dose fentanyl anesthesia is its relatively small effect on peripheral vascular resistance. In a randomized study, the authors examined the possibility that the hemodynamic differences between morphine and fentanyl might be attributable to histamine release. Fifteen patients were studied prior to coronary artery bypass surgery. Subjects received in infusion of morphine (1 mg . kg-1, iv at 100 micrograms . kg-1 . min-1 [n = 8]) or fentanyl (50 micrograms . kg-1 at 5 micrograms . kg-1 . min-1 [n = 7]). Patients in the morphine group had an average 750 per cent peak increase in plasma histamine accompanied by a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (-27 mmHg- and systemic vascular resistance (-520 dyne . s . cm-5). The greatest decrease in systemic vascular resistance occurred in those patients with the highest levels of plasma histamine (r = -0.81). Patients in the fentanyl group had no change in plasma histamine and no decrease in arterial pressure or systemic vascular resistance. Cardiac output and heart rate were comparable between the two groups. Differences in the release of histamine account for most, if not all, of the different effects of morphine and fentanyl on the peripheral vasculature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6172999     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198202000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  56 in total

Review 1.  Sedation and analgesia in paediatric intensive care units: a guide to drug selection and use.

Authors:  J D Tobias
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Use of methohexital for elective intubation in neonates.

Authors:  G Naulaers; E Deloof; C Vanhole; E Kola; H Devlieger
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  Comparative tolerability of sedative agents in head-injured adults.

Authors:  Susan C Urwin; David K Menon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Adverse effects of systemic opioid analgesics.

Authors:  S A Schug; D Zech; S Grond
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Perioperative management of the asthmatic patient.

Authors:  C A Hirshman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  Anaphylactoid reactions to narcotic analgesics.

Authors:  M M Fisher; D G Harle; B A Baldo
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1991 Fall-Winter

Review 7.  Management of anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions during anesthesia.

Authors:  B Eon; L Papazian; F Gouin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1991 Fall-Winter

Review 8.  Transdermal fentanyl. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in pain control.

Authors:  W Jeal; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Plasma histamine and hemodynamic responses following administration of nalbuphine and morphine.

Authors:  S M Muldoon; M A Donlon; R Todd; E A Helgeson; W Freas
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1984-10

10.  Preoperative characteristics predicting intraoperative hypotension and hypertension among hypertensives and diabetics undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  M E Charlson; C R MacKenzie; J P Gold; K L Ales; M Topkins; G T Shires
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.