Literature DB >> 6165562

The importance of phase of stimulus and the reference recording electrode in brain stem auditory evoked potentials.

J R Hughes, J Fino, L Gagnon.   

Abstract

In normal subjects the phase of the stimulus and the reference electrode of the brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) were investigated. Compared to condensation (C), rarefaction (R) clicks produced longer latencies, especially for peaks IN, IIIN and IV and lower amplitudes, mainly for IIN. The amplitude of the initial phase of R clicks was lower in the acoustical wave form (with piezoelectric phones) than the succeeding higher amplitude C phase, but damping characteristics varied with recording conditions. In comparing Ipsi vs. Contra ear reference the Ipsi showed a shorter latency for II and IIN, a longer latency for III, IIIN and IV and a higher amplitude, except for II. The relative contribution of the central vertex (Cz) and of each ear to the standard Cz-ear linkage was determined by referring each to an indifferent electrode. The activity at the Ipsi ear was out of phase with Cz up to peak IV, especially I, IN and III (but not II) with a resulting high amplitude in the Cz-ear linkage; in-phase relationships were noted between Cz and the Contra ear resulting in a relatively low amplitude in the Cz-Contra ear linkage. Discussion of the latter points included the complex, but significant changes of the amplitude and latency of Cz activity by an ear reference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6165562     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90205-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  7 in total

1.  Contrasting phase effects on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) produced by air- and bone-conducted stimuli.

Authors:  Sendhil Govender; Sally M Rosengren; Danielle L Dennis; Louis J Z Lim; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Peaks of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in dogs.

Authors:  Y Kawasaki; S Inada
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Extraction of the constituent components of brain stem auditory evoked responses by a filtering and optimisation procedure.

Authors:  J G Thomas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Effect of click-polarity on abnormality of intraoperatively monitored brainstem acoustic evoked potentials.

Authors:  T Mokrusch; J Schramm; A Hochstetter
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Kaushlendra Kumar; Jayashree S Bhat; Pearl Edna D'Costa; Manav Srivastava; Mohan Kumar Kalaiah
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-01-03

6.  The Effects of Random Stimulation Rate on Measurements of Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Mingxing Zhu; Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel; Xiaochen Wang; Haoshi Zhang; Junjie Yao; Yun Lu; Mingjiang Wang; Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay; Wanqing Wu; Shixiong Chen; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Janaina Patricio de Lima; Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga; Tábata Pierini Foelkel; Camila Zotelli Monteiro; Raquel Sampaio Agostinho
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.