Literature DB >> 26403294

Contrasting phase effects on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) produced by air- and bone-conducted stimuli.

Sendhil Govender1, Sally M Rosengren2,3, Danielle L Dennis1, Louis J Z Lim1, James G Colebatch4,5.   

Abstract

We have studied the effects of stimulus phase on the latency and amplitude of cVEMPs and oVEMPs by reanalysing data from Lim et al. (Exp Brain Res 224:437-445, 2013) in which alternating phase was used. Responses for the different initial stimulus phase, either positive or negative, were separated and reaveraged. We found that the phase (compressive or rarefactive) of AC 500-Hz stimuli had no significant effect on either latency or amplitude of the responses. Conversely, phase (positive = motor towards subjects) did alter the effects of BC 500-Hz stimulation. For cVEMPs, phase consistently affected initial latency with earlier responses for positive stimuli, while, for stimulation at the mastoid, negative onset phase gave larger responses. For the oVEMP, effects were different for the two sites of BC stimulation. At the forehead, the response appeared to invert, whereas at the mastoid there appeared to be a delay of the initial response. Related to this, the effect of phase for the two sites was opposite: at the mastoid, positive responses were earlier but negative were larger (particularly for long stimuli). At the forehead, the effect was the opposite: negative onset stimuli evoked earlier responses, whereas positive onset evoked larger responses. These findings indicate a basic difference in the way that AC and BC stimuli activate vestibular receptors and also indicate that the effects of phase of BC stimulation depend on location. Stimulus alternation does little to affect the response to AC stimulation but obscures the effects of BC stimuli, particularly for the oVEMP.

Keywords:  Duration; Phase; Polarity; VEMP; oVEMP

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26403294     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4441-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are sensitive to stimulus phase.

Authors:  Ken Y Cai; Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  A utricular origin of frequency tuning to low-frequency vibration in the human vestibular system?

Authors:  Neil P M Todd; Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  The effects of reversing the polarity of frequency-limited single-cycle stimuli on the human auditory brain stem response.

Authors:  M S Orlando; R C Folsom
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Responses of squirrel monkey vestibular neurons to audio-frequency sound and head vibration.

Authors:  E D Young; C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs) produced by air- and bone-conducted sound.

Authors:  Neil P McAngus Todd; Sally M Rosengren; Swee T Aw; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; G M Halmagyi; N F Skuse
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) evoked by air- and bone-conducted stimuli in vestibular neuritis.

Authors:  Sendhil Govender; Danielle L Dennis; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Acoustically responsive fibers in the vestibular nerve of the cat.

Authors:  M P McCue; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to bone conducted vibration of the midline forehead at Fz in healthy subjects.

Authors:  S Iwasaki; Y E Smulders; A M Burgess; L A McGarvie; H G Macdougall; G M Halmagyi; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Recruitment properties and significance of short latency reflexes in neck and eye muscles evoked by brief lateral head accelerations.

Authors:  James G Colebatch; Danielle L Dennis; Sendhil Govender; Peggy Chen; Neil P McAngus Todd
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Postural responses in the upper limbs evoked by axial impulses: a role for reticulospinal projections.

Authors:  Baozhing Teng; Sendhil Govender; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Frequency and phase effects on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) to air-conducted sound.

Authors:  Sendhil Govender; Danielle L Dennis; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Effects of intratympanic gentamicin and intratympanic glucocorticoids in Ménière's disease: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiming Hao; Huiqian Yu; Huawei Li
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  The Contributions of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Acoustic Vestibular Stimulation to Our Understanding of the Vestibular System.

Authors:  Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Clinical value of vestibular-evoked myogenic potential tests in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Shun-Tong Gu; Xiao-Lin Bao; Jia-Liang Guo
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.474

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.