Literature DB >> 7863610

Peaks of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in dogs.

Y Kawasaki1, S Inada.   

Abstract

The effects of electrode configuration and click polarity on brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) in dogs were investigated to clarify the inconsistent nomenclature for each peak. Four positive peaks (waves 1, 2, 3 and 4) before a deep negative trough and a fifth positive peak (wave 5) following the trough were the basic components of BAEP in dogs, which were easily identified regardless of recording conditions such as electrode configuration and click polarity. Additional peaks tended to be present when a noncephalic reference electrode and/or single-polarity (rarefaction or condensation) click stimuli were used. The Roman nomenclature for the individual positive peaks of BAEP in dogs is confused owing to variations in the observed waveforms among researchers, but click polarity and/or reference electrode position can explain all the previously reported variations in BAEP waveforms in dogs. When the criteria concerning 'wave V' in the guidelines of BAEP in human beings are applied to avoid further confusion of Roman nomenclature in dogs, it is recommended that the basic five positive peaks (waves 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 as identified easily with Ai-Vertex configuration and alternating clicks) are designated as waves I, II, III, V and VI, respectively. Wave IV (wave 3b) occurs occasionally before wave V in dogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7863610     DOI: 10.1007/bf01839289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res Commun        ISSN: 0165-7380            Impact factor:   2.459


  41 in total

1.  Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat.

Authors:  J S Buchwald; C Huang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Effects of analog filtering on brain stem auditory-evoked potentials in dogs.

Authors:  Y Kawasaki; S Inada
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.156

3.  Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses: effects of audiogram shape and lesion location.

Authors:  A C Coats; J L Martin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1977-10

4.  Cochlear nerve potentials recorded from the ear canal in man.

Authors:  G Salomon; C Elberling
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Power spectral analysis and digital filtration of brain stem auditory evoked potentials in dogs.

Authors:  Y Kawasaki; S Inada
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  American Electroencephalographic Society. Guidelines for clinical evoked potential studies.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.177

7.  Reference values of the brainstem auditory evoked response of methoxyflurane anesthetized and unanesthetized dogs.

Authors:  L J Myers; R W Redding; S Wilson
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  Brain stem auditory evoked response development in the kitten.

Authors:  C Shipley; J S Buchwald; R Norman; D Guthrie
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-01-27       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Auditory brain stem potentials in monkey (M. mulatta) and man.

Authors:  A R Allen; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-07

10.  Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in the rat: effects of gender, stimulus characteristics and ethanol sedation.

Authors:  M W Church; H L Williams; J A Holloway
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparison of the brainstem auditory evoked response in healthy ears of unilaterally deaf dogs and bilaterally hearing dogs.

Authors:  M Plonek; J Nicpoń; K Kubiak; M Wrzosek
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procynoides).

Authors:  Raluca Ștefănescu; Constantin Roman; Liviu Dan Miron; Gheorghe Solcan; Vasile Vulpe; Luminița Diana Hrițcu; Mihai Musteata
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-02       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.