Literature DB >> 6160525

The refurbished pulse generator.

H Mond, S Tartaglia, A Cole, G Sloman.   

Abstract

With the advent of long-life lithium pulse generators, normally functioning pulse generators with a potential life of more than five years have been removed from patients and become available for re-implantation. Although pulse generator refurbishing is widely employed, the practice has not been accepted in the United States. At The Royal Melbourne Hospital, all lithium pulse generators removed because of patient death or other causes were washed in a quaternary ammonium compound and soaked in formaldehyde. Pulse generators were than electronically tested and, if within specification, were made available for re-implantation. Pulse generators were then washed under sterile conditions in distilled water and gas-sterilized with ethylene oxide. Between 1975 and 1978 (48 months), 600 pulse generators were implanted and 93 pulse generators removed. There were 56 deaths, 22 cases of pre-erosion, erosion, or infection and 15 elective removals either due to lead problems or impending power source depletion. Eight-three (89%) pulse generators were refurbished (14% of total implants). This included 12 pulse generators refurbished on two occasions. Ten pulse generators were returned to manufacturers, seven because of impending power source depletion, two with suspected electronic faults, and one with a damaged case. Two complications occurred in patients with refurbished pulse generators. An infective process present with the previous pulse generator spread to a new pocket. The other pulse generator was removed 35 months post second implantation because of impending power source depletion. Primary infection or unusual tissue reactions did not occur. Pulse generator refurbishing as described was found to be a safe and economic procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6160525     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1980.tb05238.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  Medical devices labelled for single use: the reuse of permanent cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  M Rosengarten
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Reuse of pacemakers, defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation devices.

Authors:  Raja J Selvaraj; R Sakthivel; Santhosh Satheesh; Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai; Pascal Sagnol; Xavier Jouven; Bernard Dodinot; Jayaraman Balachander
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2017-01-23

3.  Societal views of pacemaker reutilization for those with untreated symptomatic bradycardia in underserved nations.

Authors:  Lindsey Gakenheimer; Dave C Lange; Joshua Romero; James N Kirkpatrick; Patricia Sovitch; Hakan Oral; Kim A Eagle; Timir S Baman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Reuse of permanent cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  M D Rosengarten; D Portnoy; R C Chiu; A K Paterson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Reuse of infected cardiac rhythm management devices in the same individual.

Authors:  Duan Jiangbo; Li Xuebin; Zhang Ping; Wang Long; Li Ding; Chu Xianming; Ze Feng; Fang Yong; Yuan Cuizhen; Guo Jihong
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Re-use of explanted DDD pacemakers as VDD- clinical utility and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  K K N Namboodiri; Y P Sharma; H K Bali; A Grover
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2004-01-01

7.  Reuse of explanted pacemakers: an option for economically underprivileged patients in developing countries.

Authors:  Johnson Francis; R Anilkumar; Harry Mond
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2007-10-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.