Literature DB >> 6156673

Subnuclear fractionation by mild micrococcal-nuclease treatment of nuclei of different transcriptional activities causes a partition of expressed and non-expressed genes.

G J Dimitriadis, J R Tata.   

Abstract

Extremely mild treatment with micrococcal nuclease of isolated nuclei yields subnuclear fractions in which the majority of RNA polymerase II transcriptional complexes formed in vivo are segregated [Tata & Baker (1978) J. Mol. Biol. 118, 249-272]. We now describe different approaches followed to established whether or not the nuclei are thus resolved into transcribed and non-transcribed DNA. First, we have compared the sensitivity to deoxyribonuclease I, which is known to digest preferably expressed genes as present in nuclei or chromatin, of three micrococcal-nuclease-derived fractions from nuclei of different transcriptional activities. In transcriptionally active nuclei (rat liver, hen liver and oviduct, and Xenopus liver), the DNA in a polynucleosomal fraction comprising 6-15% of DNA and the majority of template-engaged RNA polymerase II (fraction P2) was 10-50 times as sensitive to deoxyribonuclease I as the DNA in the other two fractions (fractions P1 and S, comprising 78-88% of total nuclear DNA as large polynucleosomal aggregates and 2-6% of DNA mostly as mononucleosomes, respectively). In transcriptionally inactive nuclei obtained from hen erythrocytes, micrococcal nuclease did not separate DNA into fractions exhibiting such differential sensitivities. Second, we have monitored the partition of an expressed gene. Hybridization of complementary DNA to Xenopus albumin mRNA revealed a 5-10-fold enrichment of the albumin (but not the globin) gene in the P2 fraction of nuclei from Xenopus liver in which this gene is fully expressed. Third, a large part of the nascent rapidly labelled RNA synthesized in vivo in rat liver nuclei was recovered in the micrococcal-nuclease-derived fraction that is more susceptible to digestion with deoxyribonuclease I. It is concluded that mild micrococcal-nuclease treatment of nuclei causes their separation into transcribed and non-transcribed DNA as determined by a number of very different criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6156673      PMCID: PMC1161813          DOI: 10.1042/bj1870467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  60 in total

1.  Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit.

Authors:  P Oudet; M Gross-Bellard; P Chambon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Structure of transcriptionally active chromatin.

Authors:  J M Gottesfeld; R F Murphy; J Bonner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Chemical and physical properties of fractionated chromatin.

Authors:  E M Berkowitz; P Doty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Biogenesis of mRNA: genetic regulation in mammalian cells.

Authors:  J E Darnell; W R Jelinek; G R Molloy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Gel electrophoresis of avian leukosis and sarcoma viral RNA in formamide: comparison with other viral and cellular RNA species.

Authors:  P H Duesberg; P K Vogt
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Sub-nuclear fractionation. I. Procedure and characterization of fractions.

Authors:  J R Tata; B Baker
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  Sub-nuclear fractionation. II. Intranuclear compartmentation of transcription in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  J R Tata; B Baker
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Analysis of repeating DNA sequences by reassociation.

Authors:  R J Britten; D E Graham; B R Neufeld
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Isolation of high-molecular-weight DNA from mammalian cells.

Authors:  M Gross-Bellard; P Oudet; P Chambon
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1973-07-02

10.  Nuclei from rat liver: isolation method that combines purity with high yield.

Authors:  G Blobel; V R Potter
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  10 in total

1.  Conformation and expression of the albumin gene of young and old rats.

Authors:  A Singh; S Singh; M S Kanungo
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Molecular and functional diversity of non-histone protein fraction NHCP1 from hamster Kirkman-Robbins hepatoma and liver.

Authors:  Z Kiliańska; W M Krajewska; A Lipińska; L Kłyszejko-Stefanowicz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  Localization of DNA methyltransferase in the chromatin of Friend erythroleukemia cells.

Authors:  F Creusot; J K Christman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-10-24       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Effect of estrogen on Xenopus laevis albumin mRNA levels.

Authors:  V Zongza-Dimitriadis; G J Dimitriadis
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Synthesis and characterization of a DNA complementary to Xenopus laevis albumin mRNA.

Authors:  G J Dimitriadis; V Zongza-Dimitriadis
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.396

6.  [Structural arrangement of chromatin (author's transl)].

Authors:  E Harbers; R Brust; H Notbohm
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1982-01-15

7.  Effect of thyrotropin on 32P-labelled histones H1 and H3 in specific populations of nucleosomes in the thyroid.

Authors:  E Cooper; R J Palmer; S W Spaulding
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-07-24       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Conformational changes in the chromatin of the brain of developing rats and its modulation by zinc chloride.

Authors:  P C Supakar; M S Kanungo
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Distribution of chromatin proteins between fractions of hamster liver chromatin differing in their susceptibility to micrococcal nuclease.

Authors:  Z Kiliańska; A Lipińska; W M Krajewska; L Klyszejko-Stefanowicz
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1982-11-30       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  Differential sensitization to deoxyribonuclease I of Xenopus vitellogenin and albumin genes during primary and secondary induction of vitellogenesis by oestradiol.

Authors:  G J Dimitriadis; J R Tata
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1982-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.