Literature DB >> 6155131

Dose-response study of the nasal decongestant and cardiovascular effects of pseudoephedrine.

D W Empey, G A Young, E Letley, G C John, P Smith, K A McDonnell, L R Bagg, D T Hughes.   

Abstract

1 The effects of different doses of orally administered pseudoephedrine on nasal airway resistance (NAR) were studied in a group of eighteen healthy subjects using double-blind conditions with drugs administered in a series of cross-over experiments according to a Latin-square design. 2 Challenge with 1% histamine diphosphate to one nostril 1 h after administration of the drugs produced increases in NAR. 3 The effects of pre-treatment with both placebo and increasing doses of pseudoephedrine on this histamine-induced increase in NAR were examined. Pseudoephedrine 60 mg, 120 mg and 180 mg significantly (P less than 0.05) reduced the effect of histamine on NAR compared with the placebo, and the protective effects of these doses did not differ significantly from each other. Pseudoephedrine 15 mg and 30 mg did not differ from placebo in their effects on NAR. 4 Small, but statistically significant increases in pulse and systolic blood pressure occurred after pseudoephedrine 120 mg and 180 mg, but not after pseudoephedrine 60 mg, 30 mg or 15 mg. No significant effects were produced by any of the doses of pseudephedrine with regard to diastolic blood pressure. Similarly no dose of pseudoephedrine altered mood or produced any excess of unwanted effects compared with placebo. 5 We conclude that pseudoephedrine 60 mg is the optimal single adult dose since this achieves maximal nasal decongestion without cardiovascular or other unwanted effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6155131      PMCID: PMC1429971          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01061.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  7 in total

1.  A Double-blind crossover trial of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine, alone and in combination, for the treatment of allergenic rhinitis.

Authors:  D W Empey; C Bye; M Hodder; D T Hughes
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1975-01

2.  Changes in human nasal resistance associated with exercise, hyperventilation and rebreathing.

Authors:  N S Dallimore; R Eccles
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  The effects of nitrous oxide on the human auditory evoked response.

Authors:  M Lader; H Norris
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1969

4.  The central rhythm of the nasal cycle.

Authors:  R Eccles
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  A comparison of plasma levels of L(+) pseudoephedrine following different formulations, and their relation to cardiovascular and subjective effects in man.

Authors:  C Bye; H M Hill; D T Hughes; A W Peck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Comparison of the effects of D-(-)-ephedrine and L-(+)-pseudoephedrine on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems in man.

Authors:  C D Drew; G T Knight; D T Hughes; M Bush
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Histamine challenge and anterior nasal rhinometry: their use in the assessment of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine as nasal decongestants in subjects with hayfever.

Authors:  M G Britton; D W Empey; G C John; K A McDonnell; D T Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.335

  7 in total
  20 in total

Review 1.  Substitution of phenylephrine for pseudoephedrine as a nasal decongeststant. An illogical way to control methamphetamine abuse.

Authors:  Ronald Eccles
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Subtypes of functional alpha1-adrenoceptor.

Authors:  James R Docherty
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of phenylpropanolamine and phenylephrine containing proprietary cold remedies.

Authors:  S H Thomas; K L Clark; R Allen; S E Smith
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Evaluation of an alpha agonist alone and in combination with a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent in the treatment of experimental rhinovirus colds.

Authors:  S J Sperber; J V Sorrentino; D K Riker; F G Hayden
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1989-01

5.  A controlled clinical trial on the cardiovascular effects of single doses of pseudoephedrine in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  S S Chua; S I Benrimoj; R D Gordon; G Williams
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Nasal decongestants.

Authors:  D W Empey; K T Medder
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Comparison of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine, alone and in combination in preventing nasal congestion in subjects with allergic rhinitis using nasal histamine challenge.

Authors:  D W Empey; M F Frosolono; D T Hughes; J G Perkins
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Intranasally administered phenylephrine and blood pressure.

Authors:  M G Myers; J J Iazzetta
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Effects of terfenadine and pseudoephedrine, alone and in combination in a nasal provocation test and in perennial rhinitis.

Authors:  S Henauer; M Seppey; C Huguenot; A Pécoud
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  A comparison of the bronchodilator action of pseudoephedrine and ephedrine in patients with reversible airway obstruction.

Authors:  L A Laitinen; D W Empey; C Bye; M G Britton; K McDonnell; D T Hughes
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.