Literature DB >> 1804647

Effects of terfenadine and pseudoephedrine, alone and in combination in a nasal provocation test and in perennial rhinitis.

S Henauer1, M Seppey, C Huguenot, A Pécoud.   

Abstract

The effects of terfenadine and pseudoephedrine, alone and in combination, have been assessed in a nasal provocation test and in perennial rhinitis. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over nasal provocation test, twelve men allergic to grass pollen were treated with two daily doses of placebo, terfenadine 60 mg, pseudoephedrine 120 mg, or the combination of the two, for 2 days preceding each test. The allergic reaction threshold, based on rhinorrhoea, sneezing and nasal inspiratory peak flow rate, was raised significantly both by terfenadine and pseudoephedrine, and their effects appeared additive (repeated measures analysis of variance). In a double-blind, randomized clinical study of perennial rhinitis two parallel groups, the efficacy and tolerability of terfenadine and terfenadine-pseudoephedrine were compared in 50 patients. Symptoms and signs in both groups were improved after 14 days of treatment. Differences between groups showed a trend in favour of terfenadine-pseudoephedrine, for swelling of the nasal mucosa (rhinoscopy) they were statistically significant. Both medications were well tolerated overall, although adverse events and reactions were more frequent in the terfenadine-pseudoephedrine group. In conclusion, terfenadine-pseudoephedrine and its constituents taken alone were effective. The combination performed better, but adverse events were somewhat more frequent with the combination than with terfenadine alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1804647     DOI: 10.1007/BF00314960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  18 in total

1.  Antihistamines: impaired performance and the tendency to sleep.

Authors:  A N Nicholson; B M Stone
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Follow-up study of pseudoephedrine users.

Authors:  M Porta; H Jick; J A Habakangas
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1986-11

3.  Terfenadine in allergic rhinitis. A comparative trial of a new antihistamine versus chlorpheniramine and placebo.

Authors:  C I Backhouse; B S Brewster; J D Lockhart; S Maneksha; C R Purvis; J C Vallé-Jones
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1982-02

4.  Antihistamines and driving safety.

Authors:  J F O'Hanlon
Journal:  Cutis       Date:  1988-10-27

5.  Should sympathomimetics be available over the counter?

Authors:  J P Morgan
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-10-10

6.  Dose tolerance and pharmacokinetic studies of L (+) pseudoephedrine capsules in man.

Authors:  J Dickerson; D Perrier; M Mayersohn; R Bressler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-12-01       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Physiologic/clinical comparisons of a sustained-release decongestant combination, its components and placebo in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  B M Cohen
Journal:  J Asthma Res       Date:  1975-09

8.  Dose-response study of the nasal decongestant and cardiovascular effects of pseudoephedrine.

Authors:  D W Empey; G A Young; E Letley; G C John; P Smith; K A McDonnell; L R Bagg; D T Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Terfenadine. A review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  E M Sorkin; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Comparison of levocabastine, a new selective H1-receptor antagonist, and disodium cromoglycate, in a nasal provocation test with allergen.

Authors:  M Kolly; A Pécoud
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The antihistamines of the nineties.

Authors:  M M Janssens; P H Howarth
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1993
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.