Literature DB >> 6153057

Improving hypertension control: impact of computer feedback and physician education.

J C Dickinson, G A Warshaw, S H Gehlbach, J A Bobula, L H Muhlbaier, G R Parkerson.   

Abstract

Two interventions designed to help physicians manage hypertensive patients were evaluated in a controlled trial: 1) computer-generated feedback to facilitate identification of poorly controlled patients; and 2) a physician education program on clinical management strategies, emphasizing patient compliance. Four physician practice teams received either computer feedback, the education program, both, or neither. Feedback team physicians received seven monthly listings of the latest visits and blood pressures of their hypertensive patients. The self-administered learning program included written clinical stimulations and associated didactic material. Experimental and control physicians were similar in baseline knowledge, patient mix and level of training. All feedback team physicians requested appointments for listed patients, and their patients made twice as many visits as control patients during the intervention period (p less than 0.05). Education team physicians showed significant gains on a content-specific post-intervention test: mean score 84 per cent compared with 74 per cent for the control group (p less than 0.005). All patient groups showed improvement in blood pressure over the study period. However, no differences between intervention teams could be detected (p greater than 0.20). The probability of missing a 10 mm interteam difference in outcome diastolic pressure was 1 per cent (power of 0.99). Strategies for further improvement in outpatient hypertension management may need to come from outside the traditional medical model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6153057     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  16 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; M Wensing; R P Grol; T van der Weijden; C van Weel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Computer-generated patient education materials: do they affect professional practice? A systematic review.

Authors:  Shaun P Treweek; Claire Glenton; Andrew D Oxman; Alister Penrose
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Computer-focused modification of physician prescribing behavior.

Authors:  F J Zieve; E Ciesco
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

Review 4.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

5.  Testing various methods of introducing health charts into medical records in family medicine units.

Authors:  R N Battista; J I Williams; J Boucher; E Rosenberg; S J Stachenko; J Adam; C Levinton; S Suissa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback.

Authors:  Gro Jamtvedt; Jane M Young; Doris T Kristoffersen; Mary Ann O'Brien; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

Review 7.  Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?

Authors:  M Wensing; T van der Weijden; R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Methods of transmitting information on hypertension to family physicians: a review.

Authors:  K V Rudnick
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Organizing and accessing the literature.

Authors:  R B Haynes
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug

10.  A systematic review of the use of computers in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  A A Montgomery; T Fahey
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.